--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" <emptybill@...> wrote: > > > He is easy enough to find on the net but his other trackable interests > are more about certain aspects of Western esoterica. However he likes to > look down on everyone so he keeps to a safe height. Pun intended. > > However, if challeged in a pressing way, he feels threated and looks for > something personal to reveal about you, even if he once promised to keep > such personal correspondences between the two of you off-line. Thus be > warned ... only give him personal info which is unprovable ... (my momma > smoked cigars) ... heh, heh. > > In Buddist Tantra this is called breaking samaya (samaya is a pledge of > honor -like a knight would give to his liege lord). Of course this is > not a problem for people without any honor. > > So while it would be legit to say "this other tradition says (a+b=c) > rather than what TM says (c+e= g)", he doesn't work that way. He is on a > quest to disinfranchise people from their practice ... which is a form > of spititual slander -something consisidered more than just bad form. > > Different religions do this all the time. Mahayanists do this to so-call > Hinayana Buddhists all the time. The same is done to the Mahayana by > Tantric and Dzogchen practitioners, although most Buddhist teachers no > longer do it. Westerner's don't usually buy into it much because we've > heard all this kind of stuff before ... this religion, that sect, my > guru sez , my Lama sez, etc, etc. However, this is probably where he > gets his inclination to try to stick it to TM practitioners. > > However, I know his sources. No reason to stay silent while he weaves a > web designed to dazzle the uninformed.
Religious fanatics of all time have done the same thing.