--- In [email protected], "raunchydog" <raunchydog@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > Now see? This is why I don't post here much anymore -- Curtis says it > > > better. > > > > > > GAWD I love your wit and better yet, you the writer. > > > > > > If I had to choose one word fer ya, it'd be "clarity." > > > > > > Edg > > > > > > I would have preferred "like a goat he hangith" but thanks, and I love you > > too man. > > > > Curtis hangith like a goat with ample aplaumbs. > > http://forum.figu.org/us/messages/14/10987.jpg > > Love ya, man.
Back atcha Rauncy! This dude is in serious need of a radical Brazilian if he intends to cut into any of my action around here! A little "Just for Men" wouldn't hurt either unless he is going for chicks who dig Civil War reenactors. (Exactly one of those was spotted once on the grounds of the Rappahannock Station battlefield last Summer, although there is some discrepancy in the reports if she was post or pre-op.) > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > You know Edg it is rare that I can find some topic that would lead me > > > > into a pro-censorish post. What an opportunity for something "new" for > > > > my calcified brain. > > > > > > > > From a casual lurker perspective, I was tempted to weigh in for the > > > > Ravi Alex gay bash video. I felt the intention was off my scale of > > > > acceptable. Ravi may have used his abrasiveness to bash someone for > > > > some higher purpose known only to himself in the past, but I sensed a > > > > shift toward using people as emotional punching bags in a way I do not > > > > appreciate. Alex handled it all with his usual aplaumb (first time > > > > word use and it wont be the last baby!) so I figured WTF, no reason to > > > > draw the inevitable unpleasant fire my way since I am not in posting > > > > mode these days. > > > > > > > > But then the Raunchy tirade came out, and despite her obviously ample > > > > aplaumbs (Still working out some of the kinks on using this word...) > > > > and her ability to defend herself, it again caught my eye as over my > > > > personal line. There was a different kind of demeaning harshness that > > > > I don't like. > > > > > > > > I would not shed a Gandhian tear if Rick decided that this is not what > > > > FFL is about and liberated Ravi to find a forum that valued his level > > > > of "enlightened" FU wisdom with no limits. (I put enlightened in > > > > quotes just to make sure that everyone knew that I revere his state as > > > > the true "enlightened" one that we should all respect as the toppermost > > > > of the poppermost in enlightenmentintudealistic splendor. I may be > > > > skeptical of many things concerning spirituality, but I am very, very > > > > confident that if there is a highest state of human development, this > > > > is what it would look and sound like. Really. Seriously. I mean it. > > > > Oh hell, I tried to keep that together and now I have 1%, grass-fed, no > > > > antibiotics, milk all over my keyboard!) > > > > > > > > So there you have it. I don't support any version of going after gay > > > > people for being gay with intent to demean, and I don't support a post, > > > > to women especially but for anyone really, that involves that style of > > > > repeated references to the one-eyed pirate crossing the reef of teeth > > > > only to walk the uvula plank to plunge into the bay of the deep throat > > > > with the intent I felt from that post. It had more of a prison sex vibe > > > > to me and turns FFL into the written equivalent of video chat > > > > roulette.Too much men's junk in your face.) > > > > > > > > Maybe just speaking up is all that is needed for a correction to be > > > > made and more drastic action is not needed. But I am glad this line > > > > was drawn and support it. > > > > > > > > It is likely that this position will draw a rash of "but so and so says > > > > worse things and you don't say anything." I am afraid those responses > > > > will fall on deaf semi-lurking ears. Sorry in advance for not caring > > > > about anyone else's line drawing preferences. If this post is seen as a > > > > version of hypocrisy when compared to other things I have said about > > > > free speech here, I will be more sympathetic since I am not sure how I > > > > feel about it all myself at this point. Work in progress. > > > > > > > > I believe in the freedom of using sexual material here in the form of > > > > celebrating that physical love between two consenting adults is one of > > > > the most beautiful, precious, wonderful, heart-healing, life-affirming, > > > > actual miracles... > > > > > > > > that money can buy. > > > > >
