--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > -- In [email protected], "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Now see? This is why I don't post here much anymore -- Curtis says it > > > > better. > > > > > > > > GAWD I love your wit and better yet, you the writer. > > > > > > > > If I had to choose one word fer ya, it'd be "clarity." > > > > > > > > Edg > > > > > > > > > I would have preferred "like a goat he hangith" but thanks, and I love > > > you too man. > > > > > > > Curtis hangith like a goat with ample aplaumbs. > > > > http://forum.figu.org/us/messages/14/10987.jpg > > > > Love ya, man. > > > > Back atcha Raunchy! > > This dude is in serious need of a radical Brazilian if he intends to cut into > any of my action around here! A little "Just for Men" wouldn't hurt either > unless he is going for chicks who dig Civil War reenactors. (Exactly one of > those was spotted once on the grounds of the Rappahannock Station battlefield > last Summer, although there is some discrepancy in the reports if she was > post or pre-op.) > >
Nary a nut Escapes a close pruning. Funky or free Brazil waxes mooning. http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-february-13-2002/brazil-nuts > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > You know Edg it is rare that I can find some topic that would lead me > > > > > into a pro-censorish post. What an opportunity for something "new" > > > > > for my calcified brain. > > > > > > > > > > From a casual lurker perspective, I was tempted to weigh in for the > > > > > Ravi Alex gay bash video. I felt the intention was off my scale of > > > > > acceptable. Ravi may have used his abrasiveness to bash someone for > > > > > some higher purpose known only to himself in the past, but I sensed > > > > > a shift toward using people as emotional punching bags in a way I do > > > > > not appreciate. Alex handled it all with his usual aplaumb (first > > > > > time word use and it wont be the last baby!) so I figured WTF, no > > > > > reason to draw the inevitable unpleasant fire my way since I am not > > > > > in posting mode these days. > > > > > > > > > > But then the Raunchy tirade came out, and despite her obviously ample > > > > > aplaumbs (Still working out some of the kinks on using this word...) > > > > > and her ability to defend herself, it again caught my eye as over my > > > > > personal line. There was a different kind of demeaning harshness > > > > > that I don't like. > > > > > > > > > > I would not shed a Gandhian tear if Rick decided that this is not > > > > > what FFL is about and liberated Ravi to find a forum that valued his > > > > > level of "enlightened" FU wisdom with no limits. (I put enlightened > > > > > in quotes just to make sure that everyone knew that I revere his > > > > > state as the true "enlightened" one that we should all respect as the > > > > > toppermost of the poppermost in enlightenmentintudealistic splendor. > > > > > I may be skeptical of many things concerning spirituality, but I am > > > > > very, very confident that if there is a highest state of human > > > > > development, this is what it would look and sound like. Really. > > > > > Seriously. I mean it. Oh hell, I tried to keep that together and > > > > > now I have 1%, grass-fed, no antibiotics, milk all over my keyboard!) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So there you have it. I don't support any version of going after gay > > > > > people for being gay with intent to demean, and I don't support a > > > > > post, to women especially but for anyone really, that involves that > > > > > style of repeated references to the one-eyed pirate crossing the reef > > > > > of teeth only to walk the uvula plank to plunge into the bay of the > > > > > deep throat with the intent I felt from that post. It had more of a > > > > > prison sex vibe to me and turns FFL into the written equivalent of > > > > > video chat roulette.Too much men's junk in your face.) > > > > > > > > > > Maybe just speaking up is all that is needed for a correction to be > > > > > made and more drastic action is not needed. But I am glad this line > > > > > was drawn and support it. > > > > > > > > > > It is likely that this position will draw a rash of "but so and so > > > > > says worse things and you don't say anything." I am afraid those > > > > > responses will fall on deaf semi-lurking ears. Sorry in advance for > > > > > not caring about anyone else's line drawing preferences. If this post > > > > > is seen as a version of hypocrisy when compared to other things I > > > > > have said about free speech here, I will be more sympathetic since I > > > > > am not sure how I feel about it all myself at this point. Work in > > > > > progress. > > > > > > > > > > I believe in the freedom of using sexual material here in the form of > > > > > celebrating that physical love between two consenting adults is one > > > > > of the most beautiful, precious, wonderful, heart-healing, > > > > > life-affirming, actual miracles... > > > > > > > > > > that money can buy. > > > > > > > >
