--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > I am sorry, Auth. > > > > I did not mean to label you as an initiator. > > Huh?? I'm missing something. You posted the video of a "Cat > Fight." I assumed you were referring to my disagreement with > Susan. "Cat fight" is a term used to trivialize any > disagreement between two women. That seemed very unlike you.
A joking cat fight? A joke is very much like me. : ) I find a cat fight not so trivial. A cat knows what it is doing. A ha ha, on this thread known as "Happy new year to everyone!!! (And more love bombing.)" So this is a love bomb to meow my way to purring at a thread named so highly as the start of 2012 and to whisper sweet auspicious notes to show how easy it is to take any thread and change the meaning of purpose. :) > > I don't get where "initiator" comes into this at all. So > I'm confused...you're more than welcome to unconfuse me if > you think it's worth it. > > It is always worth a response to you. I am not near my post count limit! Oh that auto correct (gotta turn that thing off.), I meant instigator, "I did not mean to label you as in instigator." (If that appeared what I was doing.) That I was sorry for...see above sorry and the now existing ones, just passed. Also, I understand that statement was suggestive. That, I apologize for. If you thought the cat fight video was posted as directed at your response of the thread, heck no, just the view from the start @3:05 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwnDC3_fVgM the ongoing timeless nature of man. Judy, you are my Durga and no toes to step on yours, in my book. [bow] > > > I only placed that there as it was the closest post near the top at the > > time, to throw a wrench in the spoke of the mountain bikes blazing down > > Pike's Peak. : ) > > > > It was an avatar's view of the most recent posts, without thought of the > > past, and as you know, there is perception building taking place, people > > claiming username's reputations are at stake, group building, etc., of > > others and I clearly see your point of view being asserted as commendable > > behavior. > > I know Ravi is joking. Truly joking and playing with mindsets to level the > > playing field of intelligence to spark creative return. He really has not > > much ego and that is a fictitous display on FFL. If anyone gets offended by > > him, that is in their own heads. > > I also know the MaskedZebra does the same and in actuality I can see Barry > > is also a foot stomping funny at this also. Curtis, too, has some funnies, > > but maybe as a musician, they are sensitive, ya know. > > > > You know, Judy, these are all dudes. Dudes have some funny ways of puffing > > their feathers, sometimes. ; ) > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxbrL0e_5Hc : ) > > > > > > Not funny, obba. > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote: > <snip> >
