--- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > I am sorry, Auth. > > > > > > I did not mean to label you as an initiator. > > > > Huh?? I'm missing something. You posted the video of a "Cat > > Fight." I assumed you were referring to my disagreement with > > Susan. "Cat fight" is a term used to trivialize any > > disagreement between two women. That seemed very unlike you. > > A joking cat fight? > A joke is very much like me. : )
But your jokes are always funny! > I find a cat fight not so trivial. A cat knows what it is doing. > A ha ha, on this thread known as "Happy new year to everyone!!! > (And more love bombing.)" No kidding... > So this is a love bomb to meow my way to purring at a thread > named so highly as the start of 2012 and to whisper sweet > auspicious notes to show how easy it is to take any thread and > change the meaning of purpose. :) Sounds good. > > I don't get where "initiator" comes into this at all. So > > I'm confused...you're more than welcome to unconfuse me if > > you think it's worth it. > > > It is always worth a response to you. I am not near my post > count limit! > Oh that auto correct (gotta turn that thing off.), I meant > instigator, "I did not mean to label you as in instigator." > (If that appeared what I was doing.) Ohhhhhhh, I see. No, that didn't appear to be what you were doing. > That I was sorry for...see above sorry and the now existing > ones, just passed. Also, I understand that statement was > suggestive. That, I apologize for. You are forgiven, my...uh...son or daughter. ;-) > If you thought the cat fight video was posted as directed at > your response of the thread, heck no, just the view from the > start @3:05 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwnDC3_fVgM the > ongoing timeless nature of man. Wow, OK, so FFL is the Mahabharata Part 49,017. Love the narrator's voice. Wish there were subtitles... > Judy, you are my Durga and no toes to step on yours, in > my book. [bow] Nifty! [high-five] Thanks for clarifying. > > > I only placed that there as it was the closest post near the top at the > > > time, to throw a wrench in the spoke of the mountain bikes blazing down > > > Pike's Peak. : ) > > > > > > It was an avatar's view of the most recent posts, without thought of the > > > past, and as you know, there is perception building taking place, people > > > claiming username's reputations are at stake, group building, etc., of > > > others and I clearly see your point of view being asserted as commendable > > > behavior. > > > I know Ravi is joking. Truly joking and playing with mindsets to level > > > the playing field of intelligence to spark creative return. He really has > > > not much ego and that is a fictitous display on FFL. If anyone gets > > > offended by him, that is in their own heads. > > > I also know the MaskedZebra does the same and in actuality I can see > > > Barry is also a foot stomping funny at this also. Curtis, too, has some > > > funnies, but maybe as a musician, they are sensitive, ya know. > > > > > > You know, Judy, these are all dudes. Dudes have some funny ways of > > > puffing their feathers, sometimes. ; ) > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxbrL0e_5Hc : ) > > > > > > > > Not funny, obba. > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote: > > <snip> > > >
