Steve, I was asking why fight unfairly which only makes matter worse. I don't at all equate that with what you're talking about, getting into the conflict tho not having intended to. Share
________________________________ From: seventhray1 <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 3:06 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!" Share, With all due respect. I think some of us can be guilty of this notion of "bringing a knife to gun fight". Or rather, we didn't originally come to fight at all, but realize we are up against someone who has come to fight, and fight to win and will deploy whatever arsenal is necessary to effect this outcome. And yes, I think Judy misses much of the humor and subtlety that takes place here. She remains primarily focused on promoting the rightness of her POV. The bigger casualty is that the overall dialogue. It is hard to discuss something without quickly coming up against what she feels are vital distinctions. And then before you know it, you are stuck in a never ending, meaningless discussion about some obscure point that has no bearing on the overall picture. --- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > I noticed that Judy did not recognize the humor in my exchange with > Richard. Perhaps something similar is going on here. However Curtis, it > was clear to me that you were making a joke with the called a meeting > comment. > > > The insinuation that you and Sal conspired about the email to Emily is unfair > fighting and makes matters worse. Why do that? > > ________________________________ > From: curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 12:42 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut > up; it's my turn!" > > >  > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" authfriend@ wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > Curtis *could* have avoided all but #1 (at least as far as we > > > > know; was the email really all Sal's idea? did she run it by > > > > him, and if so did he encourage her to send it?). > > > > > > Judy at her finest. > > > > Too funny, after Curtis tried to insinuate that I had "called > > a meeting" to get Ann and raunchy to criticize Curtis. > > > > His hypocrisy comes so naturally to him that he doesn't even > > try to hide it. > > So desperate for manufactured material that you are even willing to make > yourself look this thick? So you got that I was suggesting that you guys > literally called a meeting? And you thought that other readers might be > confused if you pretended it was as literal as your insinuation? > > That's why I call you the troll queen. > > > >
