I noticed that Judy did not recognize the humor in my exchange with Richard. Perhaps something similar is going on here. However Curtis, it was clear to me that you were making a joke with the called a meeting comment.
The insinuation that you and Sal conspired about the email to Emily is unfair fighting and makes matters worse. Why do that? ________________________________ From: curtisdeltablues <curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 12:42 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!" --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > Curtis *could* have avoided all but #1 (at least as far as we > > > know; was the email really all Sal's idea? did she run it by > > > him, and if so did he encourage her to send it?). > > > > Judy at her finest. > > Too funny, after Curtis tried to insinuate that I had "called > a meeting" to get Ann and raunchy to criticize Curtis. > > His hypocrisy comes so naturally to him that he doesn't even > try to hide it. So desperate for manufactured material that you are even willing to make yourself look this thick? So you got that I was suggesting that you guys literally called a meeting? And you thought that other readers might be confused if you pretended it was as literal as your insinuation? That's why I call you the troll queen. >
