Share, forgive me, but you are very much out of the loop
here.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote:
>
> I noticed that Judy did not recognize the humor in my exchange with
> Richard. Perhaps something similar is going on here. However Curtis, it
> was clear to me that you were making a joke with the called a meeting
> comment.
>
>
> The insinuation that you and Sal conspired about the email to Emily is unfair
> fighting and makes matters worse. Why do that?
>
> ________________________________
> From: curtisdeltablues <curtisdeltablues@...>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 12:42 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut
> up; it's my turn!"
>
>
> Â
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Curtis *could* have avoided all but #1 (at least as far as we
> > > > know; was the email really all Sal's idea? did she run it by
> > > > him, and if so did he encourage her to send it?).
> > >
> > > Judy at her finest.
> >
> > Too funny, after Curtis tried to insinuate that I had "called
> > a meeting" to get Ann and raunchy to criticize Curtis.
> >
> > His hypocrisy comes so naturally to him that he doesn't even
> > try to hide it.
>
> So desperate for manufactured material that you are even willing to make
> yourself look this thick? So you got that I was suggesting that you guys
> literally called a meeting? And you thought that other readers might be
> confused if you pretended it was as literal as your insinuation?
>
> That's why I call you the troll queen.
>
> >
>
