See, that's how confused I got, it wasn't Share who mentioned bringing a knife to a gunfight but Steve! So maybe he can answer that one. But I think I attributed the unfair fighting reference to Share which is accurate, as far as I can tell. Phew.
--- In [email protected], "seventhray1" <lurkernomore20002000@...> wrote: > > Okay. No biggie. > --- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@> > wrote: > > > > Steve, I was asking why fight unfairly which only makes matter > worse. I don't at all equate that with what you're talking about, > getting into the conflict tho not having intended to. Share > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: seventhray1 lurkernomore20002000@ > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 3:06 PM > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to > shut up; it's my turn!" > > > > > >  > > Share, > > > > With all due respect.  I think some of us can be guilty of this > notion of "bringing a knife to gun fight". Or rather, we didn't > originally come to fight at all, but realize we are up against someone > who has come to fight, and fight to win and will deploy whatever arsenal > is necessary to effect this outcome. > > > > And yes, I think Judy misses much of the humor and subtlety that takes > place here.  She remains primarily focused on promoting the > rightness of her POV. > > > > The bigger casualty is that the overall dialogue.  It is hard > to discuss something without quickly coming up against what she feels > are vital distinctions. > > > > And then before you know it, you are stuck in a never ending, > meaningless discussion about some obscure point that has no bearing on > the overall picture. > >   > > --- In [email protected], Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: > > > > > > I noticed that Judy did not recognize the humor in my exchange with > Richard.àPerhaps something similar is going on here.à> However Curtis, it was clear to me that you were making a joke with the > called a meeting comment. > > > > > > > > > The insinuation that you and Sal conspired about the email to Emily > is unfair fighting and makes matters worse.àWhy do that? > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ > > > To: [email protected] > > > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 12:42 PM > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going > to shut up; it's my turn!" > > > > > > > > > à> > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" authfriend@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Curtis *could* have avoided all but #1 (at least as far as we > > > > > > know; was the email really all Sal's idea? did she run it by > > > > > > him, and if so did he encourage her to send it?). > > > > > > > > > > Judy at her finest. > > > > > > > > Too funny, after Curtis tried to insinuate that I had "called > > > > a meeting" to get Ann and raunchy to criticize Curtis. > > > > > > > > His hypocrisy comes so naturally to him that he doesn't even > > > > try to hide it. > > > > > > So desperate for manufactured material that you are even willing to > make yourself look this thick? So you got that I was suggesting that > you guys literally called a meeting? And you thought that other readers > might be confused if you pretended it was as literal as your > insinuation? > > > > > > That's why I call you the troll queen. > > > > > > > > > > > > >
