Dear Ann, 

When you walk in the rain it would be best
if your mouth was kept closed.

I'm afraid that otherwise you would drown.

xoxoxo, 

Azgrey

--- In [email protected], awoelflebater <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> See, that's how confused I got, it wasn't Share who mentioned bringing a 
> knife to a gunfight but Steve! So maybe he can answer that one. But I think I 
> attributed the unfair fighting reference to Share which is accurate, as far 
> as I can tell. Phew.
> 
> --- In [email protected], "seventhray1" <lurkernomore20002000@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Okay.  No biggie.
> > --- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Steve, I was asking why fight unfairly which only makes matter
> > worse.  I don't at all equate that with what you're talking about,
> > getting into the conflict tho not having intended to. Share
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >  From: seventhray1 lurkernomore20002000@
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 3:06 PM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann  "I'm not going to
> > shut up; it's my turn!"
> > >
> > >
> > > Â
> > > Share,
> > >
> > > With all due respect. Â I think some of us can be guilty of this
> > notion of "bringing a knife to gun fight". Or rather, we didn't
> > originally come to fight at all, but realize we are up against someone
> > who has come to fight, and fight to win and will deploy whatever arsenal
> > is necessary to effect this outcome.
> > >
> > > And yes, I think Judy misses much of the humor and subtlety that takes
> > place here. Â She remains primarily focused on promoting the
> > rightness of her POV.Â
> > >
> > > The bigger casualty is that the overall dialogue.  It is hard
> > to discuss something without quickly coming up against what she feels
> > are vital distinctions.
> > >
> > > And then before you know it, you are stuck in a never ending,
> > meaningless discussion about some obscure point that has no bearing on
> > the overall picture.
> > > Â Â
> > > --- In [email protected], Share Long sharelong60@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I noticed that Judy did not recognize the humor in my exchange with
> > Richard.  Perhaps something similar is going on here. 
> > However Curtis, it was clear to me that you were making a joke with the
> > called a meeting comment.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The insinuation that you and Sal conspired about the email to Emily
> > is unfair fighting and makes matters worse.  Why do that?
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >  From: curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 12:42 PM
> > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann  "I'm not going
> > to shut up; it's my turn!"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ÂÂ
> > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" authfriend@
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues"
> > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Curtis *could* have avoided all but #1 (at least as far as we
> > > > > > > know; was the email really all Sal's idea? did she run it by
> > > > > > > him, and if so did he encourage her to send it?).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Judy at her finest.
> > > > >
> > > > > Too funny, after Curtis tried to insinuate that I had "called
> > > > > a meeting" to get Ann and raunchy to criticize Curtis.
> > > > >
> > > > > His hypocrisy comes so naturally to him that he doesn't even
> > > > > try to hide it.
> > > >
> > > > So desperate for manufactured material that you are even willing to
> > make yourself look this thick?  So you got that I was suggesting that
> > you guys literally called a meeting?  And you thought that other readers
> > might be confused if you pretended it was as literal as your
> > insinuation?
> > > >
> > > > That's why I call you the troll queen.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to