Oh my God, I can't believe I'm just answering you! Well, out of town most of yesterday. Anyway, I'm good thanks. How about you?
I think one has to be a woman to grok the offensiveness of the c word. Not sure if there's any word comparable in the male world. I'm glad you participate here too, lurking no more (-: ________________________________ From: seventhray1 <lurkernomore20002...@yahoo.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 12:16 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!" Hey Share, como sa va? I understand how you might be offended by Barry's comment. I mean out of context it appears far worse than it is, at least IMO. But the crudeness of the comment does not seem to be the issue, at least with Raunchy and Judy. The issue is whether or not it is a death threat. And they are trying to make the case that it is, and I'm afraid they have fallen short in that regard. Oh, I'm glad you participate here. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > I would not call it a death threat. But extreme vicious. OTOH, I climb on > no bandwagons but ones of my own choosing. If that's doubling down, then so > be it. > > > I understand that this has been going on for years. For me, only a very > short time. Hoping that enables me to add compassion and reasonableness and > unbiting unbaiting humor. And I'm probably gonna make more mistakes along > the way.   > > PS Too late! I'm sure I've already been a laughingstock. So far I find > that I can live with it. > > ________________________________ > From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 10:20 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut > up; it's my turn!" > > >  > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: > > > > Yep, I can be an idiot sometimes. But I think your dumb > > c joke was well over the vicious line. As was your post > > about Judy's gig which I replied to earlier... > > Would you characterize it as a "death threat?" > > They did. > > And, when numerous posters here suggested what > laughingstocks they were making of themselves > by so claiming, they "doubled down," and have > continued to do so to this day. > > My riff may well have been "vicious," but then > you weren't there to see what both of these > women posted day after day during the last > election season with their obsessions about > Obama and his supporters. And it was all a > long shaggy dog story leading up to the > punchline of the joke, a riff on "Liar, liar, > pants on fire." > > Methinks you're "doubling down" a bit yourself. > > If you deny this, climb on board the Raunchy- > Judy bandwagon and call my joke a "death threat" > too. And become a laughingstock yourself. > > YOU haven't been the target of Judy's obsession > for years. Curtis and I have, as have Vaj and > many others here. But mark my words, you *will* > be if you continue to commit the Cardinal Sin > of liking people she doesn't want you to like. >
