--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote: > > *State of FFL vs Share Long* > * > * > *Dec 2nd, 2012* > * > * > *Exhibit D* > > The jurors dubbed the "3 Idiots" - feste, Buck, Steve continue to view this > as another example of the innocence, sincerity of the defendant Share Long. > > Juror#4 - Laughinggull insists on fair play much to the annoyance of > everyone. > > Juror#5 - Barry continues to be hostile and demeaning towards the defendant > and may soon be dismissed because of contempt of court. > > The other jurors dubbed the "wts seven" rightly see this as yet another > pattern of the defendant's deceptive damsel-in-distress plea of innocence.
OK Ravi, I officially loved this. > > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > 1. Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy Share and Emily > > continuing to communicate with each other? > > 2. If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can come of it? > > 3. What do you think would be a viable next step to move closer to those > > benefits with a minimum of what's not beneficial? > > > > I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome this > > evening. I have not discussed them with anyone. > > I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and 3. > > In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters. > > > > My answers: > > 2. I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on FFL would come of it. > > 3. This post IS my viable next step! > > 1. I'm not sure. But I'm open to the possibility of yes. > > > > I'm hoping for some fun answers too (-: > > Thank you everyone for your time and thoughts and caring. > > > > > > >
