There has been lots of regularly reported info out for at least 8 years now.  
No one reads it, or has taken it seriously, even though there is plenty of 
scientific data behind it and has been. This is the most significant problem of 
all for humanity and for this planet, but people have focused on other s..t all 
these years.  

The only real change in the last decade is that the whole process of global 
warming is happening EVEN FASTER than the direst predictions of a decade ago.  
The only reason people are now paying attention is that is is costing them 
money or might do so. And by the time that happens, it is too late.  Actually, 
unless science comes up with a way to undo or mitigate drastically what has 
ALREADY happened, it is too late.  Some people will probably survive in the 
end. But it will get mighty ugly along the way.    If they can find a way to 
change this scenario, that would be the age of enlightenment, really and truly 
a miracle.  The bulk of our resources should go to that - a planetary race, a 
competition, to figure this out.  That is where we are at, whether the public 
gets this or not.  Living off the grid, buying a Prius, recycling, driving less 
- all are nice and helpful but don't make a dent in the catastrophe that is 
going on right now.

Let's change the topic - I spent nearly half a year in a real funk about this 
in 2006.  I had to make a decision to not read more about it or think too much 
on it.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote:
>
> 
> "..it's as if no-one is listening to the scientific community," said Corinne 
> Le Quere, director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at the 
> University of East Anglia.
> 
> "I am worried that the risks of dangerous climate change are too high on our 
> current emissions trajectory," Prof Le Quere said.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Recently, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) reported that 
> > > > > > greenhouse gases in the atmosphere hit a new record high in 2011.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Data show that global CO2 emissions in 2012 hit 35.6bn tonnes, a 
> > > > > > > 2.6% increase from 2011 and 58% above 1990 levels.
> > > > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > In its annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin, the organisation said that 
> > > > carbon dioxide levels reached 391 parts per million in 2011.
> > > >
> > 
> > The report estimated that carbon dioxide (CO2) accounted for 85% of the 
> > "radiative forcing" that led to global temperature rises.
> > 
> > Other potent greenhouse gases such as methane also recorded new highs, 
> > according to the WMO report.
> >  
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > Non-meditators are the real carbon polluters behind the destruction 
> > > > > of the global climate. Well you know a positive scientific case could 
> > > > > be made that spiritual people who are regular meditators and 
> > > > > especially meditating on the Invincible American course are much less 
> > > > > responsible for global climate change than the average non-meditating 
> > > > > American or any other first world or developing nation peoples.  
> > > > > Simply on a materialistic level of gross consumption, that anyone who 
> > > > > is on the full schedule of meditation in the Domes contributing to 
> > > > > world peace otherwise in fact creates much less carbon damage to the 
> > > > > atmosphere and global climate than the average CO2 emitting consuming 
> > > > > American.  At a minimum, people on the Invincible America course 
> > > > > simply do not have the time to consume materially like non-meditaters 
> > > > > do.
> > > > > -Buck
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Once again it is evident that the problem with society is, 
> > > 'non-meditation'.  Even just stopping and taking a quiet time meditation 
> > > twice a day would be good for the global climate.  In prudent public 
> > > policy taking quiet time meditation breaks at least twice a day should 
> > > probably be required for everyone's well-being and safety.
> > > -Buck
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to