Knapp sounds like a narcissistic, near sociopath, dishonest, shyster. Share, why do you post what you do about the "healers" you see? Barry has gone off the deep end again on this - why? Carol, neither of your links came through to my Yahoo email, however, I remember information from a prior post a long while back that was included. There is nothing wrong with you being here - I think it's a good thing to bring his doings to the attention of others.
>________________________________ > From: Carol <jchwe...@gmail.com> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 7:52 AM >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Re- John M Knapp - Johnny Profane > > > >Hey Share... > >Not that I know of. > >I posted in this thread awhile back because someone had brought up Knapp's >name and something having to do with Knapp's questionable honesty. > >So..I responded in this thread (mindfulness) regarding a snippet of my >situation with Knapp and, since I had supported him here previously, I wanted >to retract my endorsements. > >Here is a link to my initial post on here about my retraction regarding Knapp: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/303061 > >Thus I posted the few updates here (and there have been few, not many). > >The above link is not my first post on FFL, but was my first post regarding >exposing Knapp. > >I'd have to search back to find my previous postings which were about other >subjects, some of which were supportive of Knapp. > >Knapp is well know among the TMO (anti and pro) crowd. > >As far as motive? It has been (at least on here) to expose Knapp's dishonesty >in his dealings. He had continued to list himself as a cult-recovery therapist >on his professional LinkedIn page through the latter part of 2012. I do not >know if he was continuing to counsel or not. > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: >> >> Carol, is someone on FFL availing themselves of John's services? Or is >> about to? Is that why you recently resumed posting about him here? >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Carol >> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 8:52 AM >> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Re- John M Knapp - Johnny Profane >> >> >>  >> Hey again Barry, >> >> I've thought it'd be fun to have wings...ya' know, loons. They are pretty >> in flight. >> >> OK. Again your opinion is noted...because that's all it is...you're opinion. >> >> You can read my motives on my blog. But I'm sure you won't because you don't >> care which makes me wonder why you even direct a post at me. >> >> I guess you care because you want to express your opinion about me? >> >> I don't have a grudge against Knapp. To expose someone who has harmed others >> without accountability does not mean someone has a grudge. >> >> Does it still anger me that he lied like he did, that he lied about others, >> that he mistreated me, that he has psychologically raped people, that he has >> unpaid financial debts to people, and other stuff that I am not at liberty >> to share? Sure. But that's not a grudge. >> >> If I really wanted to 'at' Knapp, I could make public his very revealing >> private emails to me. But, I haven't done that. >> >> Knapp knows he lied. He may continue to lie to his new circle; I do no know. >> >> You are wrong though that I have only come here to post about Knapp. I do >> read other threads when I come here on and off. I have come here without >> ever posting anything. Prior to when someone brought Knapp in this thread >> originally...I hadn't posted about Knapp. >> >> I haven't engaged in the three descriptions you list as far as >> cyberstalking. I researched cyberstalking pretty well after Knapp went on >> his defamatory outrage. >> >> I've never approach any of Knapp's friends, family, etc., for any >> information on Knapp. >> >> I've never tried to trace Knapp anywhere. I have read his public Facebook >> page. If you think that is cyberstalking, so be it. >> >> Yes, I did monitor Knapp's online Facebook page. NY state was looking for >> him. He had skipped state and never responded to their requests when he was >> there and left no forwarding address. Little did I know at the time about >> the other outstanding judgement against him in another county in NY. NY >> state asked if I knew Knapp's whereabouts...so I read his Facebook page >> which gave Knapp's whereabouts. >> >> I've never even 'harassed' Knapp. I posted my story on my blog and on one >> other online forum. I didn't encourage anyone to join me. And no one did. If >> sharing my experience is harassment, so be it. >> >> What is the difference between whistleblowing about an organization and >> whistleblowing about a corrupt mental health therapist? >> >> And even at that...my whistle is hardly very loud. But you did say I >> 'barged' in. >> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: >> > >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Carol" wrote: >> > > >> > > Thanks Judy. >> > > >> > > Also, I understand why Barry would view me as a "cyberstalker" >> > > based on what Knapp has stated about me. Plus, the only thing >> > > I've posted on this list in the last 1-1/2(?) years has been >> > > about Knapp. >> > >> > Duh. That's exactly it. You barged onto a forum that you have no other >> > interest in EXCEPT as a means of "getting" someone you have a grudge >> > against. I've never heard anything that Knapp said about you; I'm >> > judging you because of *your* behavior. >> > >> > > Barry may not recall that I had posted a few years prior >> > > that I was a teenage TMer and was looking at going to MMU. >> > > Then again, maybe he does recall, but I don't know why he >> > > would. It's been awhile. >> > >> > Barry doesn't give a shit. I've found both you AND your motives >> > repulsive from Day One. Since Judy seems to believe that Wikipedia is to >> > be trusted in all things, let's see what it has to say about >> > cyberstalking, eh? >> > >> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking >> > >> > >> > Please note the parts about it being a criminal offense. Note also some >> > of the typical behavior of cyberstalkers: >> > >> > * Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may >> > approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain >> > personal information. >> > >> > >> > * Monitoring their target's online activities and attempting to trace >> > their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their >> > victims. >> > >> > >> > * Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to >> > involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has >> > harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the >> > victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join >> > the pursuit. >> > You're an official Cyberstalker as far as I'm concerned, and that has >> > *nothing* to do with how I feel about John Knapp. He may be the worst >> > flake in the world, but *he* is not the person who has devoted the best >> > part of a year to tracking his movements and his activities and trying >> > anything she could to harm his reputation or to get him into trouble. >> > >> > You're a fuckin' loon. The only reason Judy is agreeing with you or >> > supporting you is that she is a Cyberstalker, too, and John Knapp is one >> > of *her* ongoing victims as well, because he was instrumental in >> > revealing truths about the TM movement and Maharishi she would have >> > preferred remain hidden. The only reason Nabby chimed in is because he >> > also bears a grudge because of Knapp's TM whistleblowing, too. >> > >> > The three of you make a lovely group: >> > >> > >> > > ************ >> > > >> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: >> > > > >> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Carol" wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > At the end of December, 2012, I decided to bring forth Knapp's >> > 2011 >> > > > > > online defamatory posts aimed at myself and others. >> > > > > > This link contains a table of contents to Knapp's posts that I >> > am >> > > > > > bringing forward. >> > > > > >> > > > > Please go away. You're a stalker. Nobody cares that you >> > > > > didn't like it when Knapp refused to continue working >> > > > > with you as a patient. I have no great love for John, >> > > > > but I can certainly see why he would have decided that. >> > > > >> > > > Barry, you know exactly nothing about this. What you think >> > > > you know is wrong. Knapp is a potential menace to anyone >> > > > considering counseling with him. Hopefully he's gone out >> > > > of the therapy business for good. If so, anything Carol did >> > > > to bring this about she should be congratulated for. It >> > > > took more guts than you dream of having. >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >
