Oops...rereading I see I posted an error (not to mention my typos). In my last post I stated that prior to when someone brought Knapp up in this thread that I hadn't posted about Knapp. Actually I had. My posts about Knapp prior to this thread (and from a couple years back) were in support of Knapp.
My recent Knapp posts are not supportive, obviously. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Carol" wrote: > > Hey again Barry, > > I've thought it'd be fun to have wings...ya' know, loons. They are pretty in > flight. > > OK. Again your opinion is noted...because that's all it is...you're opinion. > > You can read my motives on my blog. But I'm sure you won't because you don't > care which makes me wonder why you even direct a post at me. > > I guess you care because you want to express your opinion about me? > > I don't have a grudge against Knapp. To expose someone who has harmed others > without accountability does not mean someone has a grudge. > > Does it still anger me that he lied like he did, that he lied about others, > that he mistreated me, that he has psychologically raped people, that he has > unpaid financial debts to people, and other stuff that I am not at liberty to > share? Sure. But that's not a grudge. > > If I really wanted to 'at' Knapp, I could make public his very revealing > private emails to me. But, I haven't done that. > > Knapp knows he lied. He may continue to lie to his new circle; I do no know. > > You are wrong though that I have only come here to post about Knapp. I do > read other threads when I come here on and off. I have come here without ever > posting anything. Prior to when someone brought Knapp in this thread > originally...I hadn't posted about Knapp. > > I haven't engaged in the three descriptions you list as far as cyberstalking. > I researched cyberstalking pretty well after Knapp went on his defamatory > outrage. > > I've never approach any of Knapp's friends, family, etc., for any information > on Knapp. > > I've never tried to trace Knapp anywhere. I have read his public Facebook > page. If you think that is cyberstalking, so be it. > > Yes, I did monitor Knapp's online Facebook page. NY state was looking for > him. He had skipped state and never responded to their requests when he was > there and left no forwarding address. Little did I know at the time about the > other outstanding judgement against him in another county in NY. NY state > asked if I knew Knapp's whereabouts...so I read his Facebook page which gave > Knapp's whereabouts. > > I've never even 'harassed' Knapp. I posted my story on my blog and on one > other online forum. I didn't encourage anyone to join me. And no one did. If > sharing my experience is harassment, so be it. > > What is the difference between whistleblowing about an organization and > whistleblowing about a corrupt mental health therapist? > > And even at that...my whistle is hardly very loud. But you did say I 'barged' > in. > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Carol" wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Judy. > > > > > > Also, I understand why Barry would view me as a "cyberstalker" > > > based on what Knapp has stated about me. Plus, the only thing > > > I've posted on this list in the last 1-1/2(?) years has been > > > about Knapp. > > > > Duh. That's exactly it. You barged onto a forum that you have no other > > interest in EXCEPT as a means of "getting" someone you have a grudge > > against. I've never heard anything that Knapp said about you; I'm > > judging you because of *your* behavior. > > > > > Barry may not recall that I had posted a few years prior > > > that I was a teenage TMer and was looking at going to MMU. > > > Then again, maybe he does recall, but I don't know why he > > > would. It's been awhile. > > > > Barry doesn't give a shit. I've found both you AND your motives > > repulsive from Day One. Since Judy seems to believe that Wikipedia is to > > be trusted in all things, let's see what it has to say about > > cyberstalking, eh? > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking > > > > > > Please note the parts about it being a criminal offense. Note also some > > of the typical behavior of cyberstalkers: > > > > * Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may > > approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain > > personal information. > > > > > > * Monitoring their target's online activities and attempting to trace > > their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their > > victims. > > > > > > * Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to > > involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has > > harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the > > victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join > > the pursuit. > > You're an official Cyberstalker as far as I'm concerned, and that has > > *nothing* to do with how I feel about John Knapp. He may be the worst > > flake in the world, but *he* is not the person who has devoted the best > > part of a year to tracking his movements and his activities and trying > > anything she could to harm his reputation or to get him into trouble. > > > > You're a fuckin' loon. The only reason Judy is agreeing with you or > > supporting you is that she is a Cyberstalker, too, and John Knapp is one > > of *her* ongoing victims as well, because he was instrumental in > > revealing truths about the TM movement and Maharishi she would have > > preferred remain hidden. The only reason Nabby chimed in is because he > > also bears a grudge because of Knapp's TM whistleblowing, too. > > > > The three of you make a lovely group: > > > > > > > ************ > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Carol" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > At the end of December, 2012, I decided to bring forth Knapp's > > 2011 > > > > > > online defamatory posts aimed at myself and others. > > > > > > This link contains a table of contents to Knapp's posts that I > > am > > > > > > bringing forward. > > > > > > > > > > Please go away. You're a stalker. Nobody cares that you > > > > > didn't like it when Knapp refused to continue working > > > > > with you as a patient. I have no great love for John, > > > > > but I can certainly see why he would have decided that. > > > > > > > > Barry, you know exactly nothing about this. What you think > > > > you know is wrong. Knapp is a potential menace to anyone > > > > considering counseling with him. Hopefully he's gone out > > > > of the therapy business for good. If so, anything Carol did > > > > to bring this about she should be congratulated for. It > > > > took more guts than you dream of having. > > > > > > > > > >
