--- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley" wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "Buck" wrote: > > > > There is a really interesting article generally about deploying 'public > > opinion shapers' on the internet. I never realized this could happen on > > the internet. -Buck > > "The tactic is similar to China's model of internet moderators who aim to > > control news and manipulate opinion." Alex? > > > > > The post was spam. But, it was also sufficiently Ru-ish that I thought I'd > let it through one time on the chance that people might find it interesting. > Card's responses lead me to believe I did the right thing. >
Dear Alex, is this person any different than many of the polemicals who particularly jockey and publish here vigorously publishing against their "online hostile forces"? This one was a fine line between someone trying to sell sell something unsolicited to an exclusive captive audience (FFL membership) / (spam) and then honestly trying to clean out some old bad PR from the internet (published previously on FFL and still in the archive) that the search engines evidently churn up when looking for "Light therapy with gems in Maharishi Ayurveda".
