That's nothin' - He called a mangy old dog that was lame, and blind in one eye, "Mom", once!!!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: > > He called you a cunt, Auth!!! > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m07ISfx_5b0 > > > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > > > > > See Barry. See Barry go crazy trying to prove himself > > > > RIGHT, DAMNIT and make a fool of himself for our > > > > amusement. :-) > > > > > > See dumb cunt. Digging herself in deeper. :-) :-) :-) > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > None of this rant, Barry, contradicts anything I've said. > > > > > > > > > > Sez the person who claimed: > > > > > > For the record, this is not true. The Inquisition has > > > > > > been in continuous operation since it was established > > > > > > in 1542. > > > > > > > > > > The Inquisition was first formed in 1188. The > > > > > running of the Inquisition was turned over to > > > > > the Dominicans in 1232. > > > > > > > > Not the Inquisition that Ratzinger headed. > > > > > > > > There have been four major Inquisitions: the Medieval > > > > Inquisition (actually a series of them that began > > > > around 1188), the Spanish Inquisition, the Portuguese > > > > Inquisition, and the Roman Inquisition. > > > > > > There has never been anything *other* than The > > > Inquisition. Its basic nature and charter has > > > never changed since 1188, and the people running > > > it have never changed since 1232. All they did > > > was change the name periodically. > > > > Au contraire, Pierre. The Spanish Inquisition was > > established by Ferdinand and Isabella and was run > > independently of the Holy See. The Grand Inquisitors > > of the Portuguese Inquisition were members of the > > royal family. The Medieval Inquisition, as noted, > > was a series of local inquisitions that were run > > by local Catholic authorities until the Dominicans > > took them over. But these operations were phased > > out once the heretical movements against which > > they were directed were eliminated (Cathars, etc.). > > > > The first Inquisition run from the top down was > > the Roman Inquisition, the one Ratzinger eventually > > became the head of. It's said to have been the > > "most benign" of all of them. > > > > Of course one can refer to "The Inquisition" for > > the sake of convenience, as if it were one > > continuous monolithic operation, when one is > > speaking in the most general terms; but that > > ignores the real (not artificial) historical > > distinctions chronologically, regionally, and in > > terms of control. > > > > When one is referring to a single individual in > > modern times as having led "The Inquisition," it > > behooves one to be more specific. It would be > > correct to say that, as head of the Roman > > Inquisition, Ratzinger brought back some of its > > investigatory and disciplinary practices that had > > been abandoned in the middle of the 20th century. > > (Of course it's been awhile since the Inquisition > > went after anything but heresy *within* the > > Church.) > > > > It is *not* correct to say "Ratzinger brought back > > The Inquisition!" as if all inquisitorial activity > > had ceased and Ratzinger revived it single-handedly > > (and as if, indeed, that activity included the > > torture and executions that took place in earlier > > inquisitional phases). > > > > > > > > > > > The supposed "different Inquisitions" Judy > > > gloms onto above are artificial distinctions > > > dreamed up by scholars to classify an ongoing > > > organization into parts they could focus on in > > > their dry historical papers. Only a person who > > > believes that they can learn about the world > > > by Googling would ever have thought otherwise. > > > > > > Nighty-night, Jude. :-) > > > > > >
