Hilarious, what a project.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" 
<anartaxius@...> wrote:
>
> I took Robin's last post to Curtis and removed all of Curtis' and Ann's 
> comments and pasted all of Robin's posts into the text compactor 
> http://www.textcompactor.com/ and it choked, the text was too long. So I 
> split it into two sections, reduced the length to 10% and then reduced the 
> remainder by about 50%. This is the result:
> 
> Robin:
> 
> 'No, you will scrupulously avoid this, because it might get you trapped 
> inside where truth is--truth which does not wish to be exploited for ends 
> which falsify why it exists.'
> 
> 'You are saying here, Curtis, that Barry formed a dislike for A and Robin; 
> "So you only see the version of Barry that applies to you, a person he does 
> not respect"--meaning: A fails to realize that, outside of A, Barry does 
> demonstrate vulnerability--but A can't see this because she is subjectively 
> reacting to Barry's dislike of her. You did not in your representation of 
> what I said about Barry (you took over what that analysis was and made it 
> over into your own image of what you wanted it to be: there was hardly 
> anything left of it after that) indicate you were at all interested in 
> anything but defending Barry and getting rid of my analysis. "Funny 
> thing"--it starts off as a cliché, and just dies away in the saying of it.'
> 
> 'Ann has done her best to be fair and just to Barry here, Curtis.'
> 
> 'If you really did possess such a perspective, why have you allowed AWB to 
> fall into such ignorance about Barry, because her perspective has not been 
> informed by your own (re: Barry Wright)? So I conclude: Yes, what AWB 
> declares about Barry's predictability is unassailable--and only you have 
> sealed this by how you have responded to this assertion, Curtis.'
> 
> 'I have analyzed the "Limited" character of Barry Wright in my analysis, 
> Curtis. And that's not going to happen, because Barry would not give you that 
> opportunity, and neither will your experience or your modus operandi.'
> 
> 'The point Ann is making here, Curtis, is that you and Barry have this tacit 
> pact (I assume it has not been ritualized through ceremony or handshakes): 
> You have my back; You have my back; I have your back--at all times.'
>


Reply via email to