His Holiness must be just chilling out yeah? In a jovial, playful mood? Sweet 
to see his antics.

Because applying your disinterested, impartial POV persona I'm able to gather a 
lot of information even from that compacted text.

I won't be waiting for yours and Guru Xeno's disinterested, impartial analysis 
though because we know your personas and your target, captive audience.


On Mar 25, 2013, at 3:35 PM, "curtisdeltablues" <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Hilarious, what a project.
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" 
> <anartaxius@...> wrote:
> >
> > I took Robin's last post to Curtis and removed all of Curtis' and Ann's 
> > comments and pasted all of Robin's posts into the text compactor 
> > http://www.textcompactor.com/ and it choked, the text was too long. So I 
> > split it into two sections, reduced the length to 10% and then reduced the 
> > remainder by about 50%. This is the result:
> > 
> > Robin:
> > 
> > 'No, you will scrupulously avoid this, because it might get you trapped 
> > inside where truth is--truth which does not wish to be exploited for ends 
> > which falsify why it exists.'
> > 
> > 'You are saying here, Curtis, that Barry formed a dislike for A and Robin; 
> > "So you only see the version of Barry that applies to you, a person he does 
> > not respect"--meaning: A fails to realize that, outside of A, Barry does 
> > demonstrate vulnerability--but A can't see this because she is subjectively 
> > reacting to Barry's dislike of her. You did not in your representation of 
> > what I said about Barry (you took over what that analysis was and made it 
> > over into your own image of what you wanted it to be: there was hardly 
> > anything left of it after that) indicate you were at all interested in 
> > anything but defending Barry and getting rid of my analysis. "Funny 
> > thing"--it starts off as a cliché, and just dies away in the saying of it.'
> > 
> > 'Ann has done her best to be fair and just to Barry here, Curtis.'
> > 
> > 'If you really did possess such a perspective, why have you allowed AWB to 
> > fall into such ignorance about Barry, because her perspective has not been 
> > informed by your own (re: Barry Wright)? So I conclude: Yes, what AWB 
> > declares about Barry's predictability is unassailable--and only you have 
> > sealed this by how you have responded to this assertion, Curtis.'
> > 
> > 'I have analyzed the "Limited" character of Barry Wright in my analysis, 
> > Curtis. And that's not going to happen, because Barry would not give you 
> > that opportunity, and neither will your experience or your modus operandi.'
> > 
> > 'The point Ann is making here, Curtis, is that you and Barry have this 
> > tacit pact (I assume it has not been ritualized through ceremony or 
> > handshakes): You have my back; You have my back; I have your back--at all 
> > times.'
> >
> 
> 

Reply via email to