--- In [email protected], "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" <anartaxius@...> wrote: > > I took Robin's last post to Curtis and removed all of Curtis' and Ann's > comments and pasted all of Robin's posts into the text compactor > http://www.textcompactor.com/ and it choked, the text was too long. So I > split it into two sections, reduced the length to 10% and then reduced the > remainder by about 50%. This is the result: > > Robin: > > 'No, you will scrupulously avoid this, because it might get you trapped > inside where truth is--truth which does not wish to be exploited for ends > which falsify why it exists.' > > 'You are saying here, Curtis, that Barry formed a dislike for A and Robin; > "So you only see the version of Barry that applies to you, a person he does > not respect"--meaning: A fails to realize that, outside of A, Barry does > demonstrate vulnerability--but A can't see this because she is subjectively > reacting to Barry's dislike of her. You did not in your representation of > what I said about Barry (you took over what that analysis was and made it > over into your own image of what you wanted it to be: there was hardly > anything left of it after that) indicate you were at all interested in > anything but defending Barry and getting rid of my analysis. "Funny > thing"--it starts off as a cliché, and just dies away in the saying of it.' > > 'Ann has done her best to be fair and just to Barry here, Curtis.' > > 'If you really did possess such a perspective, why have you allowed AWB to > fall into such ignorance about Barry, because her perspective has not been > informed by your own (re: Barry Wright)? So I conclude: Yes, what AWB > declares about Barry's predictability is unassailable--and only you have > sealed this by how you have responded to this assertion, Curtis.' > > 'I have analyzed the "Limited" character of Barry Wright in my analysis, > Curtis. And that's not going to happen, because Barry would not give you that > opportunity, and neither will your experience or your modus operandi.' > > 'The point Ann is making here, Curtis, is that you and Barry have this tacit > pact (I assume it has not been ritualized through ceremony or handshakes): > You have my back; You have my back; I have your back--at all times.'
Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made it longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program to do this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is often sloppy or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail to take in half of what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text compactors already and I don't think it benefits us all that much. I don't require a computer to do it FOR me! >
