A blast from the past - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/300308
(for the clueless doctordumbass = futur.musik) On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:49 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > ** > > > The monkey, the mannequin, and the squeeze toy. Funny to see Boy Scientist > Curtis in his lab coat, railing at the podium one minute, and then when the > subject changes to interpersonal dynamics, he is suddenly dumb as a post. > > --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> > wrote: > > > > His Holiness must be just chilling out yeah? In a jovial, playful mood? > Sweet to see his antics. > > > > Because applying your disinterested, impartial POV persona I'm able to > gather a lot of information even from that compacted text. > > > > I won't be waiting for yours and Guru Xeno's disinterested, impartial > analysis though because we know your personas and your target, captive > audience. > > > > > > On Mar 25, 2013, at 3:35 PM, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> > wrote: > > > > > Hilarious, what a project. > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > <anartaxius@> wrote: > > > > > > > > I took Robin's last post to Curtis and removed all of Curtis' and > Ann's comments and pasted all of Robin's posts into the text compactor > http://www.textcompactor.com/ and it choked, the text was too long. So I > split it into two sections, reduced the length to 10% and then reduced the > remainder by about 50%. This is the result: > > > > > > > > Robin: > > > > > > > > 'No, you will scrupulously avoid this, because it might get you > trapped inside where truth is--truth which does not wish to be exploited > for ends which falsify why it exists.' > > > > > > > > 'You are saying here, Curtis, that Barry formed a dislike for A and > Robin; "So you only see the version of Barry that applies to you, a person > he does not respect"--meaning: A fails to realize that, outside of A, Barry > does demonstrate vulnerability--but A can't see this because she is > subjectively reacting to Barry's dislike of her. You did not in your > representation of what I said about Barry (you took over what that analysis > was and made it over into your own image of what you wanted it to be: there > was hardly anything left of it after that) indicate you were at all > interested in anything but defending Barry and getting rid of my analysis. > "Funny thing"--it starts off as a cliché, and just dies away in the saying > of it.' > > > > > > > > > 'Ann has done her best to be fair and just to Barry here, Curtis.' > > > > > > > > 'If you really did possess such a perspective, why have you allowed > AWB to fall into such ignorance about Barry, because her perspective has > not been informed by your own (re: Barry Wright)? So I conclude: Yes, what > AWB declares about Barry's predictability is unassailable--and only you > have sealed this by how you have responded to this assertion, Curtis.' > > > > > > > > 'I have analyzed the "Limited" character of Barry Wright in my > analysis, Curtis. And that's not going to happen, because Barry would not > give you that opportunity, and neither will your experience or your modus > operandi.' > > > > > > > > 'The point Ann is making here, Curtis, is that you and Barry have > this tacit pact (I assume it has not been ritualized through ceremony or > handshakes): You have my back; You have my back; I have your back--at all > times.' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
