--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > And if she had labeled it "ironic" like Robin the wolves
> > > > would have retreated into the forest?
> > > >
> > > > Just because she called it a "joke" doesn't mean it was
> > > > meant to be funny. She was expressing it using absurdly
> > > > light-hearted language. Its intent was obvious to me.
> > > >
> > > > But not to you two. Because your intent was to slam her.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, Share is pro rape and was trying to show how funny
> > > > the topic of baby raping and child killing is. That makes
> > > > much more sense and I'm glad you are on the job.
> > >
> > > Now that the "badger her into submission" act has
> > > failed, and Share continues to run rings around
> > > Judy and leave her increasingly frustrated and
> > > panicky, I'm surprised she hasn't trotted out the
> > > trick that worked so well on Ravi and Ann and Jim
> > > and Emily.
> > >
> > > That is, praise them and give them strokes and tell
> > > them how smart they are to agree with her, expecting
> > > them to flop onto their backs like a two-dollar whore
> > > and do whatever Judy says to do in the future. Hey,
> > > it worked with those four...maybe it'll work with Share.
> >
> > Judy may be acting in a hostile way because Share is
> > able to use language playfully so that non-agenda-driven
> > readers enjoy what she writes. I think she has drawn the
> > ire of the self-important scolders for artfully blowing
> > them off for their obviously misinterpreting her intention.
> >
> > Meanwhile Ravi, whose intent was actually to make a racist
> > statement, carefully setting it up so the intent would not
> > be missed, got off scott-free because the L'll scamp is
> > just so adorable.
> >
> > I hope we get a few more lectures from Judy on "integrity"
> > today.
>
> What I find fascinating about this whole tempest in
> a pisspot is that it so classically reeks of shrink-
> speak. Judy and Ann are acting like second-generation
> abusers, in the same way that children who were abused
> in their youth often grow up to abuse their own kids
> later in life.
>
> We don't know what turned Judy Stein into the abuser
> she is -- probably her father, if my guess is right.
>
> But with Ann, we actually *do* know. We are, after
> all, talking about the only person on this forum who
> we pretty much *know* was abused. She was dragged up
> onto a stage and yelled at by Robin Carlsen in front
> of an audience. He told her (if my memory is correct
> on this) that she was possessed by demons if not by
> Satan himself, and probably went on for some time
> (as he has a history of doing *on this forum*)
> listing everything that he finds wrong with her.
>
> So how does Ann treat people, thirty years on?
>
> She emulates Robin, and emulates Judy, and tries her
> best to drag them into a confrontation on a public
> forum and yell at them, listing everything that she
> finds wrong with them.
>
> It's really sad, when you look at it this way. THIS
> is why the anti-cult people are anti-cult. One doesn't
> just "get over" this kind of imprinting by walking
> away from the cult. It lingers for years, and then
> manifests in how the former abuse victim treats
> others.
>
> All these years on, and Ann is *still* trolling for
> Robin's attention and strokes, and defending him as
> if nothing had ever changed, and she was still a
> bonafide member of his flock. All these years on,
> and she treats people who criticize him *for doing
> the same things to them that he did to her* the
> same way he treated her.
>
> People are really fuckin' weird, if you ask me...
>
