--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> 
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" 
> > > > <anartaxius@> wrote:
> > > > (snip)
> > > > > Crop circles and aliens is difficult to believe for a number
> > > > > of reasons. Why would an alien civilisation try to make their
> > > > > presence known in such an ambiguous inept manner? Crop circles
> > > > > can be made using rope, wooden stakes, and wooden planks. This
> > > > > has been demonstrated many, many times.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't believe anybody argues crop circles can't be made
> > > > by humans, actually.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't buy the aliens explanation either. But the more you
> > > > read about crop circles, the less likely it seems that humans
> > > > could have made *all* of them, given the time constraints and
> > > > how extraordinarily elaborate many of them are.
> > > 
> > > Not humans. Not aliens. Hedgehogs?
> > >  
> > > > I have no explanation, myself. But the rope-and-stakes-and-
> > > > planks notion doesn't really do the trick.
> > > 
> > > It's true. Some of them use those plastic garden rollers.
> > 
> > You laugh, but in between the nitwit New Agers and the hard
> > skeptics is a layer of scientifically minded investigators
> > who are genuinely puzzled by the weirder aspects of the
> > phenomenon (and some of them are *very* weird).
> > 
> > And no, plastic garden rollers doesn't do the trick either.
> > There really is more to it than you think, including
> > extremely odd effects on the crop plants that aren't found
> > in circles known to have been human-made.
> 
> Or someone has a battery powered microwave oven inside the 
> garden roller. Or the army are testing sonic weapons.
> 
> Eliminate the impossible and whatever is left, however unlikely,
> must be the truth.

That assumes we know unerringly the limits of the possible.

As a corollary, Occam's razor works only in an adequate
frame of reference.


Reply via email to