Iranitea, Zarzari, You do not represent the mind of what Maharishi thinks, thought or taught, or shared.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, iranitea <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > As you know, zarzari, Robin himself corrected the post > > around four hours later, after I'd called his attention > > to the four incorrectly attributed quotes from your > > exchange with Barry (#299915). > > No, I didn't know. I had been out of town for a few days then. The wrong > post, the wrong attributions are still there, still in place. > > > I should probably have > > referred Lawson to the corrected version, > > Exactly, that's what you should have done. Then I wouldn't have come back. > People will not read all references. It is what people see, that sticks to > their minds. The wrong attributions will stick, as people see them. > > > but since > > the part of Robin's post I wanted him to read didn't > > contain any of the misattributed quotes and didn't have > > anything to do with what you and Barry had been > > discussing, it never occurred to me. > > I am aware of that. But this wrong text is still online, will be seen prior > to scrolling, without people checking it out. As you pointed to the post, I > have every right to point out the mistakes. > > > > > Btw. how reliable would a post be, that contains so many mistakes? > > > > Everybody makes attribution mistakes now and then, you > > included, zarzari. > > But these were grave. It was all topsy turvy, all attributions to me were > wrong, he drew his personal conclusions about me from these quotes mainly. He > got everything wrong, and that was only references from the close past, not > even a week ago. > > How could his remembrance and interpretation of events in the distant past, > decades away, be accurate or reliable in any sense? From a time in which he > was allegedly delusional? > > Your interpretation of Maharishi -through his eyes - cannot be accurate and > reliable. ^^^^^^ Right there. Neither through your eyes either, Mr. iranitea, zarzari. If you are a tm teacher, and I was a raja, I would fire you, just for posting all this crapola. > > > Robin was almost exclusively responding to remarks from > > Vaj in that post, and Vaj himself had not been addressing > > anything in your exchange with Barry (in which you were > > speculating about Robin's mental health). > > > > > > He's responding to a post from Vaj. > > > > > > > > You'll need to scroll down a bit, to where Robin writes, > > > > "Maharishi summoned me to Seelisberg..." > > > > If Lawson had scrolled down to that point and read just the > > self-contained section that had to do with what he and I > > were discussing, he would have scrolled right past the first > > three mistakenly attributed quotes and stopped reading before > > the last one. He would have had no reason even to look at > > the misattributed quotes from your exchange with Barry; and > > they could hardly have been less relevant to our discussion > > in any case. > > It's not about this discussion. It is that something wrong is there and being > linked to. Period. > > > I don't know why you want to call attention to the four > > mistaken attributions when you are explicitly telling folks > > not to look at them, but that's your affair. I seriously > > doubt anyone but Lawson and I went back to look at that post > > in the first place. > > Right. It's my affair if I am being misrepresented online to set this > straight. I should not rely on others, Mrs. Corrector to do that for me. > > Posts being sent in the past are being looked upon as being more authentic in > a strange way, and they are being pointed to, as if they contain some secret > clue or revelation. But as it turns out, they could just as easily be wrong > and fictitious. And then your whole building of logic will collapse. >
