--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Ah, another opportunity to tell you to go fuck yourself, Barry - And so soon! > > There is nothing altruistic or learning-oriented about what you do here. You > may have conceived this psychology in your attempt at appearing legitimate, > in your anger and frustration filled spewage, but anybody can see that, for > the pathetic excuse that it is. > > You are an emotional wreck, with nothing to offer here, except ways to tear > just about anything down that isn't you. > > Talk about an ego trip. And to have you challenge Alex repeatedly, is > pathetic. Own your shit, Barry. After all, it isn't anyone else's but yours. > And yes, it does stink. Badly.
Barry couldn't actually "challenge" Alex in any way that counts. The fact that Alex even bothers to reply shows a huge amount of patience, good nature and and optimism. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stanley@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" > > > > <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I'm referring to Barry being hugely in favor of posting > > > > > limits that are, at this point, all about Judy. Which > > > > > is not to say that others are not equally focused on Barry. > > > > > > > > 206 posts' worth this past week, either replying > > > > to something I posted, or mentioning me, just from > > > > the four core members of the MGC alone. Overall, > > > > subtracting the posts *I* made from the total, I'm > > > > mentioned or cited in over a third of all posts. > > > > > > > > I think one could make a case for "focused on." :-) > > > > > > You seem to be conveniently overlooking that most > > > reactivity toward you is in response your own > > > reactive/egoic, separation-creating behavior. For > > > example, a very common theme of your posts is to > > > describe something enjoyable in your life with a > > > zinger at the end how TM/FFLers/seekers are bad/wrong. > > > > And? > > > > If part of my "goal" were to get TMers or other seekers > > who consistently present themselves as "better" than > > others to *demonstrate* their own attachments, hatreds, > > and reactivity, and thus point out the difference between > > their PR and their reality, can you think of a more > > effective way to do so? > > > > WHAT in the post do they focus on? WHAT do they react > > to? > > > > "What you focus on, you become." > > > > Are you suggesting that they have no *choice* but to > > react the way they do? That's not much of a commercial > > for the spiritual path, is it? > > >
