But are you free enough not to need
to indulge in exaggerated claims?



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann"  wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> >
> > Now it can be told -
> >
> > People who don't like Barry's posts
> > are always free to ignore them.
>
> I'm also free to ignore the friend who repeatedly beats her dog.
> I am free to ignore the woman who has fallen in the street and can't
get up.
> I am free to ignore the fact that my house is on fire.
> I am free to ignore the fact that I am bleeding from a knife wound in
my neck.
> I am free to ignore a baby bird who has just fallen out of a nest.
>
> >
> > This type of selective attention  is the refuge of
> > anyone who realizes that human life is temporary.
> >
> > When evaluated by that standard, a large number
> > of FFL denizens of must be "heavenly immortals".
> >
> > How refreshing to find this out.
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm referring to Barry being hugely in favor of posting
> > > > limits that are, at this point, all about Judy. Which
> > > > is not to say that others are not equally focused on Barry.
> > >
> > > 206 posts' worth this past week, either replying
> > > to something I posted, or mentioning me, just from
> > > the four core members of the MGC alone. Overall,
> > > subtracting the posts *I* made from the total, I'm
> > > mentioned or cited in over a third of all posts.
> > >
> > > I think one could make a case for "focused on." :-)
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to