Oh, please. I've always had issues with your holier-than-thou moralistic pronouncements, as you well know. I was a bit shocked that you would lie about my making a spelling correction and calling it a rebuttal, but that had nothing to do with my comments on your posts today, sorry.
(Just for the record, it wasn't "hug" you mispelled as "hugh," it was "huge.") BillyG wrote: > Sounds like you're trying to get back at me now for my, "..she played that > card on me too" comment I made > a few posts back! Tit for Tat huh Judy? Remember that "hugh" gaff I made a > few months ago, yeah you > do, thanks for bringing that to everyone's attention! (I meant hug). ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote: BillyG, you know, it's courteous to quote a bit of what you're responding to, or at least to identify the writer you're responding to. You don't do that, and it makes it look as though you don't want to actually have a discussion but rather only to make proclamations.
