*Willytex drawled:**
**
**What is the world coming to when you can't even make fun of someone's
face or boots or where they were born? Emily seems like a nice girl,
she's just running with the wrong pack. Go figure.*
On 11/21/2013 6:05 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Well, I must admit, I've been quite impressed by Judy's one word
accurate descriptions of the tone of Share's posts. Judy has the
maturity to take responsibility for her language; Share doesn't.
Simple. Can you imagine how poor Share would have behaved if someone
went after her appearance and particularly if it was Judy, Ann or me?
It's a cowardly thing to do and she can spin it any way she wants;
she's a bullshit artist. And, that's all from me today.
---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote:
*Yep, here's authfriend taking the "nasty/vicious quotient of [her]
opponent's posts down a level":
*
*
*
*Share snarled:*
*Share pleaded:*
*Share babbled:*
*Share spewed:*
*Share blubbered:*
*Share bleated:*
*All from recent posts. Why can't you be honest about what you do,
authfriend? You are always babbling/spewing/blubbering/snarling about
how honest you are and how dishonest your opponents are, but why can't
you just admit that you love to be mean, nasty, and vicious? You get
pleasure out of it, which is why you do it on this forum day after
day, week after week, month after month, year after year. It satisfies
something inside you, although what that might be, only you know.
*
***
*
*
*
---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote:
I think in the heat of battle, as it were, the other guy--and/or
his or her supporters--often experiences my posts to be much more
"nasty and vicious" than they actually are. I'm frequently
surprised when I reread my own posts from some epic argument to
realize how restrained they were and how I instinctively took the
nasty/vicious quotient of my opponent's posts down a level with
each response rather than escalating it.
I think the perception of "nasty and vicious" is directly
proportional to how accurate my criticisms are. I'm sure you won't
agree, but that's why I say you'd have a hard time backing up your
accusation. You're remembering your emotional response rather than
the tone of my posts themselves.
---In [email protected],
<[email protected]> wrote:
Of course you think that, because you seem unaware of how you
come across on this forum.
---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote:
I think you'd have a real hard time backing that up in my
case, feste. But a no-brainer that Barry would be at the
top of the list.
---In [email protected],
<[email protected]> wrote:
With all this recent talk about "vicious" and "nasty"
posts, if one were to take a year's worth of FFL posts
and list by poster all the posts that might reasonably
be considered either vicious or nasty, there would be
two posters at the top of the list, way ahead of any
others. These would of course be authfriend and
turquoise b. Share would be well down on the list.
