Judy is working late in her home office. LoL!
On 11/21/2013 5:59 PM, [email protected] wrote:
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
---In [email protected], <punditster@...> wrote:
Guilty as charged: a very, very mean, nasty and vicious girl caught
lying again and again; picking on a nice girl and posting from her
home office trying to drum up some editing business! Is there anyone
on the forum who will defend the vicious Judy? Barry? LoL!
On 11/21/2013 4:41 PM, feste37 wrote:
*Yep, here's authfriend taking the "nasty/vicious quotient of [her]
opponent's posts down a level":
*
*
*
*Share snarled:*
*Share pleaded:*
*Share babbled:*
*Share spewed:*
*Share blubbered:*
*Share bleated:*
*All from recent posts. Why can't you be honest about what you do,
authfriend? You are always babbling/spewing/blubbering/snarling about
how honest you are and how dishonest your opponents are, but why
can't you just admit that you love to be mean, nasty, and vicious?
You get pleasure out of it, which is why you do it on this forum day
after day, week after week, month after month, year after year. It
satisfies something inside you, although what that might be, only you
know.
*
***
*
*
*
---In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>, <authfriend@...>
<mailto:authfriend@...> wrote:
I think in the heat of battle, as it were, the other guy--and/or his
or her supporters--often experiences my posts to be much more "nasty
and vicious" than they actually are. I'm frequently surprised when I
reread my own posts from some epic argument to realize how restrained
they were and how I instinctively took the nasty/vicious quotient of
my opponent's posts down a level with each response rather than
escalating it.
I think the perception of "nasty and vicious" is directly
proportional to how accurate my criticisms are. I'm sure you won't
agree, but that's why I say you'd have a hard time backing up your
accusation. You're remembering your emotional response rather than
the tone of my posts themselves.
---In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>,
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
Of course you think that, because you seem unaware of how you
come across on this forum.
---In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>, <authfriend@...>
<mailto:authfriend@...> wrote:
I think you'd have a real hard time backing that up in my
case, feste. But a no-brainer that Barry would be at the top
of the list.
---In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
With all this recent talk about "vicious" and "nasty"
posts, if one were to take a year's worth of FFL posts
and list by poster all the posts that might reasonably be
considered either vicious or nasty, there would be two
posters at the top of the list, way ahead of any others.
These would of course be authfriend and turquoise b.
Share would be well down on the list.
