---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, <punditster@...> wrote:
On 12/26/2013 10:45 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
His posts aren't for you Ricky, they're for those who can and do appreciate
them. You just stick with the photos of shacks and keep preening and strutting
for Sharon, okay?
So, it's a message all about Richard, but Richard isn't supposed to read it?
You're not making any sense Ann, as usual. It's considered bad form to put a
respondents name in the subject line of a message. If it's a personal message,
it would be better to send it by private email. If it's meant for the group, it
needs to be relevant to the discussion. Bob's message seems to have got your
attention though, but your reply is nonsense, so it looks like not only did Bob
waste a lot of his time composing this message for you to read, but he's
managed to waste your time as well. The least you could do for Bob is post an
intelligent reply or comment.
P.S. Have you ever heard of "snipping" posts, Ann?
No, never. Why don't you tell me all about it? Do I use scissors or nail
cutters? Do I say I snipped or simply snip and hope people figure out what I
snipped. Furthermore, could you perhaps provide an example of perfect snipping
(with plenty of white spaces in between so I can understand)? Thanking you in
advance...
