--- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> > --- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> -- snip --
>  
> > Nicely put. Any concept of "enlightened behavior" is
> > more a reflection of a cultural/psychological boundary
> > of the individual than some assessment of
> > enlightenment. By the way, I just realized, the term
> > "enlightened behavior" is an oxymoron. There is no
> > such thing as enlightened behavior. There's just
> > behavior, period. 
> > 
> In the BG MMY says at least two things that might be of guidance.
> The first is that an enlightened individual (another oxymoron..?) 
> always acts to promote evolution. The second is that of the three 
> gunas, enlightened people act under the influence of sattva.

Even more key, it seems to me, is Krishna's
assertion, "Unfathomable is the course of action."

If it's the case that we cannot know all the
ramifications of someone's behavior, as the
assertion implies, then we can't know whether a
given behavior does or does not promote evolution,
which means we cannot use behavior as a criterion
of enlightenment.

For any act, even if it appears to be thoroughly
evil, it's possible to imagine a scenario in which
the act has evolution-promoting consequences, even
if they may come to fruition way down the line (and
vice-versa, of course, for an apparently good action).

This does NOT mean that we should unquestioningly
accept the behavior of someone we assume is
enlightened in the belief that it ultimately has
to have evolutionary consequences--because we have
no way of knowing for sure if the person *is*
enlightened.

So "Unfathomable is the course of action" cuts
both ways: we can't tell from behavior whether
someone is enlightened, and because we can't tell,
we can't assume the behavior is ultimately going to
have evolutionary consequences.

In other words, assuming someone is enlightened
makes absolutely zero difference to how we should
regard his/her actions.  We can only evaluate
his/her behavior the same way we evaluate anybody
else's.

We can, however, keep in the back of the mind the
recognition that we *could* be wrong in our
evaluation.  We just have no way of knowing.






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to