that's great TurqB!
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 3/13/14, TurquoiseBee <turquoi...@yahoo.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: So what have we learned from the pundit riots?
 To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 Date: Thursday, March 13, 2014, 1:23 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
     
       
       
       Conversation in the future:
 
 Child: What did you do for the TM movement, Daddy? I mean,
 before it was able to usher in the Age Of Enlightenment and
 ensure peace for all of us?
 
 Father: Well, son, I worked on the MUM Pundit Removal Squad.
 
 
 Child: What was that, Daddy?
 
 Father: Well, there were some unruly pundits -- obviously
 unstressing or possessed by rakshasas -- who needed to be
 removed from the pundit pris...uh...I mean...compound after
 they'd created a ruckus and jeopardized our
 cashflo...uh...I mean...our efforts for world peace.
 
 Child: So how did you "remove" them, Daddy?
 
 Father: Well, we couldn't get local law enforcement to
 do it for us any more, after they had an unpleasant
 experience
  being driven away by a bunch of teenagers, so we created
 our own elite force to handle such "removals" in
 the future.
 
 Child: Did you have a uniform, Daddy?
 
 Father: You betcha, son. Shiny black boots and black
 jumpsuit, and a way scary billy club and Taser to subdue
 unruly teenagers with. 
 
 Child: How many unruly pundits did you "remove,"
 Daddy?
 
 Father: I've lost count, son. But it was all worth it,
 because we all live in the Age Of Enlightenment now, and
 everything is perfect. Now stop asking questions and eat
 your peas.
 
 Child: But I don't *like* peas, Daddy. 
 
 Father: Do you want me to get the Taser again? Do as
 you're told...
 
 
        
 From: Michael
 Jackson <mjackso...@yahoo.com>
  To:
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent:
 Thursday, March 13, 2014 2:03 PM
  Subject: Re:
 [FairfieldLife] Re: So what have we learned from the pundit
 riots?
    
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
     
       
       
       This is great! Now when the pundits riot, they
 can tear up the MUM cars!
 
 
 
 Sheriff's Office Won't Help With Next Attempt To
 Remove Pandit
 
 By Mark Carlson, Reporter
 
 
 
 FAIRFIELD, Iowa - A pandit leader that inadvertently
 triggered some unrest near Fairfield Tuesday will still be
 removed, only this time the Jefferson County Sheriff's
 office won't be preset.
 
 
 
 Bill Goldstein, co-supervisor of the pandit project, said he
 doesn't anticipate seeking assistance from law
 enforcement when the pandit is removed on a second attempt
 to send him back to India.
 
 
 
 On Tuesday, dozens of pandits threw rocks at a Sheriff's
 vehicle as the Sheriff monitored the removal of the pandit
 at the request of supervisors on the project. The protesters
 damaged the car, but the sheriff was able to escape
 unharmed. The pandit leader was eventually returned to the
 campus in a peace keeping effort.
 
 
 
 Pandits are meditators who come from India to pray for peace
 in a gated campus outside of Fairfield. They come for two to
 three year rotations from India as part of a program that
 started nearly a decade ago. They are not students of the
 nearby Maharishi University of Management, although the
 university did assist with getting the program started.
 
 
 
 It's not clear when the pandit who triggered
 Tuesday's unrest will be removed. Leaders say
 they're making an effort to meet with other pandits to
 get to the bottom of the issue. The pandit is being sent
 back to India for "disciplinary reasons."
 
 
 
 Read more:
 
http://www.kcrg.com/home/top-9/Sheriffs-Office-Wont-Help-With-Next-Attempt-To-Remove-Pandit--249973471.html#ixzz2vqbCqYwZ
 
 
 
 --------------------------------------------
 
 On Thu, 3/13/14, anartax...@yahoo.com
 <anartax...@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
 
 
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: So what have we learned
 from the pundit riots?
 
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
  Date: Thursday, March 13, 2014,     
 
        The
 
   photos of the compound in the newspaper look much
 like
 
  a minimum-security prison compound. I think all we need
 to
 
  do is have a more flexible mindset (characteristic of
 
  creative intelligence: flexibility) and agree that
 slavery
 
  is a good thing, and encourage its practise. Let's
 keep
 
  those little buggers locked up! Organisational
 transparency,
 
  freedom, compassion, that's for wimps. Totalitarian
 
  ideas is what this situation needs. Any situation that
 
  requires the natural, spontaneous flow of all the laws
 of
 
  nature to produce results must be forced into this mould
 at
 
  all costs.
 
  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 <LEnglish5@...>
 
  wrote :
 
  
 
  Are
 
  you *really* trying to make a case that children
 essentially
 
  sold into slavery by their own parents have an obligation
 to
 
  "fulfill their contract?" 
 
  
 
  Are you saying
 
  that if said *adults* are not fulfilling the terms of
 their
 
  legal contract, they should continue to be housed in the
 USA
 
  and paid money rather than flown back to their home
 
  country?
 
  You seem to be
 
  attempting to paint them as victims. They are under
 pretty
 
  much, as far as I can tell, the same kind of contract
 that
 
  trained Jackie Chan as a Chinese Opera performer in Hong
 
  Kong. Such contracts may not be the best thing for
 children,
 
  but that is irrelevant to the question of what to do
 with
 
  them once they decide to stop working after coming here
 as
 
  adults with visas that describe specific working
 
  conditions.
 
  If adults like
 
  Jackie Chan came to this country under contract to
 perform
 
  in Chinese Opera productions and decided they no longer
 
  wished to perform, the entertainment company that
 brought
 
  them to the US to perform would be under no obligation
 to
 
  continue to house them and keep them in the USA once the
 
  contractees decided to stop working.
 
  In fact, as I
 
  understand it, it would be illegal for a company to do
 so
 
  since they were given
 
  work visas in this country for a specific purpose and if
 
  they are no longer living in this country for that
 specific
 
  purpose, if they remained, they would automatically be
 here
 
  illegally unless their status was changed through action
 of
 
  American immigration officials.
 
  If
 
  they want to attempt to change their work visas, that is
 a
 
  completely different issue than what is apparently going
 on,
 
  and it is highly doubtful that any of them have work
 skills
 
  that would allow them to legally be here if it
 wasn't
 
  under the extraordinary circumstances that it took
 several
 
  years for the TM organization to
 
  arrange.
 
  Visas usually
 
  aren't given to 1,000 people at a time so they can
 come
 
  to the USA and chant and meditate for several
 
  years.
 
  If you are
 
  saying that the pandits were abused as kids and should
 be
 
  seeking asylum, that too is different than what the
 
  newspaper accounts have been saying, and you have no
 proof
 
  that it is the case. 
 
  If you are so
 
  concerned, you can always write the Indian ambassador
 and
 
  express your insider knowledge of the situation in order
 to
 
  help these people. It is your moral obligation to do so,
 
  don't you agree?
 
  
 
  L
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
      
 
       
 
  
 
      
 
      
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
    
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
     
      
 
     
     
 
 
 
 
     
 
     
      
 
     
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to