---In [email protected], <punditster@...> wrote :

 On 6/18/2014 9:55 AM, salyavin808 wrote:

 There is no evidence in physical cosmology that would indicate human 
consciousness as more than a theory.  You think the fact you can see and hear 
the world is only a theory? It's the only thing I'm certain of. >
 Your sense perceptions could be in error, but anything that only exists in the 
mind is a theory, since there are no physical objects inside our minds, we can 
only say that we are conscious of something,  That's what I mean by the only 
thing I'm sure of; that I'm conscious of something. but we can never know the 
thing as it really is, since consciousness changes the very thing being 
perceived. Objects do not exist separate from their being known, according to 
the Consciousness Only theory. Bit of a silly theory then. It looks like 
consciousness wasn't around before life on this planet* so what was the 
universe doing before that? The consciousness first idea was formulated long 
before modern cosmology got its shit together, so maybe it shouldn't be relied 
upon? It isn't like it can incorporate new ideas like evolution and remain 
credible. Unless it's true and everyone else is wrong.... 
 *Or for at least 5 billion years after the big bang for the stellar processes 
to create enough complex matter to make conscious things elsewhere. 
 
  According to Harris , there is no evidence that consciousness exists in the 
physical world. I'm part of the physical world and it exists in me.
 


 "I believe that this notion of emergence is incomprehensible—rather like a 
naive conception of the big bang. The idea that everything (matter, space-time, 
their antecedent causes, and the very laws that govern their emergence) simply 
sprang into being out of nothing seems worse than a paradox. "
 
 Sam Harris on the Mystery of Consciousness:
 http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/the-mystery-of-consciousness 
http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/the-mystery-of-consciousness
 

Reply via email to