---In [email protected], <mjackson74@...> wrote :

 I think this post should be re-titled "Xeno Crushes Ann"
 

 Well said, all of it. I would love to sit and chew the fat with you and Sal 
sometime - I bet I would mostly sit there in silence and listen.
 Dear Mike,

Please choose your company well. Then choices you make determine your Life. 
Just reread this quote from Xeno, to grok what I'm suggesting:

Xeno said: "The soap opera of personal interaction does not interest me"
 From: "Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@... [FairfieldLife]" 
<[email protected]>
 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
 Sent: Saturday, September 6, 2014 8:31 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reading or Not Reading Posts
 
 
   

 

 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]>
 To: [email protected] 
 Sent: Saturday, September 6, 2014 2:58 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reading or Not Reading Posts
 
 
 

 Wow Xeno, for a guy who has seen a few years, transcended a time or two and 
who ploddingly, dryly picks apart most subjects you certainly seem to miss the 
proverbial boat a lot. Do you ever break out of a shamble? Does red blood pump 
around in blue veins? Do you get angry, excited, passionate about anything? 
Bawee and MJ do NOT bring to light anyone's "samskaras" except what might exist 
as their own. These two are not catalysts for bringing to light anything but 
their own hanging on to past injury and perceived injustices which have 
resulted in anger and disappointment disguised as righteous desire to shake 
people up. Whatever they are doing simply pinpoints their own hanging on and 
resentment and for you to encourage or congratulate them is to illustrate your 
own limitations. Check the fluff box now.
 

 The 'fluff' box is where your messages presently reside. Samskaras are the 
main reason people act with passion, indignation. I have them too, I just do 
not have as many as I used to and some are more attenuated than formerly. If 
you push someone enough, you should be able to activate some of them and get a 
response. We humans, as bodies, are stimulus-response machines, the gunk in the 
machine determines the output from a given input. A conditioned response. My 
seemingly dispassionate responses are my conditioned responses, your passionate 
ones are yours, Barry's and Michael's are theirs. Now to my mind, Barry seems 
to have more awareness of his samskaras, his engrams, than most here even if he 
does not think of his behaviour in those terms. I have never felt Barry's 
so-called anger is real, whereas I have always felt that Judy's and yours is. 
Correct me if I am wrong about my surmise about you. The samskaras we need to 
worry about are the one's that cripple our ability function in the world and to 
form clear interpretations of what is going on in the world. PTSD is an example 
of samskaras that can cripple.
 

 I am not really interested in people as psyches, personalities. I am 
interested in experience, and in ideas about experience, and in how the world 
works, or seems to work (we may never really know how it works). The soap opera 
of personal interaction does not interest me, though I do enjoy person 
interactions, but really personal interactions are not possible when many 
functioning samskaras are running their routine because the essence of the 
person is not there, just the overly reactive conditioned responses. You know 
that quote by Eleanore Roosevelt 'great minds discuss ideas, average minds 
discuss events, small minds discuss people', and while I do not have a 
particularly great mind, I do like ideas over events and people. It's the 
proportion that counts, as it is impossible to go through a day without 
encountering events or people and what they are like. A tremendous amount of 
time is spent on FFL discussing people's behaviour; it's gossipy and shallow. 
It even happens with me, I am not immune.
 

 I enjoy Barry's and Michael's posts because they dredge up conditioned 
responses. This happens even if I am not interested or even know what their 
intent was in making the post. That is private in them. For example, I 
initially on coming to FLL had some of my samskaras activated by Barry, and I 
tried to figure him out. That turned out to be mostly a waste of time, figuring 
him out. What turned out to be more valuable was figuring 'me' out, figuring 
out why I would react a certain way to what he said. Same with Judy. Now maybe 
Barry does the same thing, but that is for him to say. How often do you analyse 
your reactions to what life presents? When we can consciously do this we can 
undermine our conditioned responses and experience a bit more freedom. When we 
are not aware, the world entraps us, conditions us. It is ironic that 
organisations, such as the TMO, verbally dedicated to liberation, freedom, 
always end up entrapping us by the creation of systems designed to condition 
our minds to a herd mentality. Quite a few here, Barry, Michael, and even you 
are aware of this. Don't sleep too much; you are going after the wrong prey, by 
looking outside for the source of your discontent.
 

 
 














 


 









Reply via email to