--- In [email protected], akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
> Since the publication of ME research, it has not, to my knowledge,
> generated any non-TMO reasreach or funding. That speaks to the
> strength and credibility of the original research.

It speaks at least as much to the unorthodox nature
of the hypothesis, actually.  Probably more, because
it's easy to dismiss an unorthodox hypothesis out of
hand as too vanishingly unlikely to make it even worth
making the effort to look closely enough at the
research to see how much strength and credibility it
has.  It's INcredible right out of the box, as far as
most scientists are concerned.

(And by "unorthodox," I mean what, for all practical
purposes, amounts to a claim to be able to do magic.)






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to