Excellent parallel and analysis.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote :

 I will have to agree with "sincere huckster." 


 In retrospect who he reminds me of the most in terms of the fluidity of his 
delivery and his seeming honest comfort with the outrageous stories he's 
telling is Carlos Castaneda. When I met him, he was exactly the same way -- so 
sure of himself and so fluid in the way he described "don Juan" and the magical 
things that went on around him that you felt you almost *had* to believe it. 


 Then later I learned more about Carlos. Turns out that there was strong 
evidence of him being a "serial liar" and "psychopathic liar" all of his life. 
It was a pattern that was already present long before he came to the US to 
study at UCLA. In gaining his original student status he'd lied about his 
original name, where he came from in South America, and failed to mention that 
he'd abandoned a wife and kid there. 


 Later, it seems that he'd taken this same...uh...less-than-truthful approach 
first to his research as an antrhopologist and later to being a big, 
best-selling New Age author. At first he took *other people's stories* and 
claimed that they were his own, and then later he began making them up 
entirely. But the thing is, in person he was so fluid and natural-sounding when 
*telling* these stories -- either in person or in his writing -- that he 
convinced people to believe them. 


 What I think is going on with George Hammond is that he is not very clueful 
about the workings of his own mind. He falls into altered states of 
consciousness in which his dreaming mind becomes active as it is processing 
weird stuff he's read about all day about Western religions and the stuff he's 
interested in. In that partially-awake dreaming state, his mind introduces 
other characters because of his fear of death, his desire to see loved ones 
like his sister and Maharishi again, and his desire to be "special" and 
"important" and the center of all cosmic action. So he lays there for a while, 
indulging these quasi-dreaming states, and then tells stories about them to 
anyone who will listen, insisting that they are real "visions." And, as with 
Castaneda, every time he tells the story it becomes more natural and more fluid 
for him, and he himself becomes more convinced it was real. This becomes a 
self-reinforcing cycle, because every time he tells the stories a few people go 
"Wow" and that increases his self-importance. 


 Anyway, that's my take on it all. Entertaining, but in the end he *really* 
doesn't have the charisma he would need to attract a younger audience, one that 
is not on death's door and panicking about it like the audience he was talking 
to yesterday. THOSE are the people who will believe him and flock to him, 
because his spiel is meant to convince them that 1) they are "important" and at 
the center of great events, 2) they are eternal and will never die, and 3) 
they're part of a big Movement of Woo Woo guys (did you notice there were no 
gals) who are officially The Biggest, Baddest Spiritual Movers The Planet Has 
Ever Seen. 


 From: "Michael Jackson mjackson74@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
 Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 9:38 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Live Stream | 30th November
 I am going back and looking at this from the beginning - what a bunch of crap. 
I think this guy is using the "I talked to Marshy" deal as a platform to 
attract an audience to get 'em to listen to his off the wall beliefs.  Just 
another (sincere) huckster following in Marshy's footsteps who was himself as 
one of the most successful hucksters in the 20th century.



 From: salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 3:19 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Live Stream | 30th November


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote :


 Everyone is "merged" with the absolute, the process of enlightenment is 
realizing it.  The absolute is all that is and  everything else is just an 
 This is where I go wrong. I'm utterly convinced it's the other way round!




              • ... salyavin808
              • ... Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
              • ... Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
              • ... salyavin808
              • ... Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
              • ... salyavin808
              • ... Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
              • ... salyavin808
              • ... TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
              • ... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
              • ... curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
              • ... Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
              • ... lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]
    • Re: [Fairf... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
  • [FairfieldLife]... dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
    • [Fairfield... lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]
      • [Fairf... dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
        • Re... Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
      • [Fairf... salyavin808
        • [F... lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]
          • ... salyavin808

Reply via email to