--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tazarmfune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>>>
> When Reagan took office government revenues were around 500 billion a  
> year , give or take about 50 billion. Before taxes were raised again
the 
> economy  had  expanded and revenues increased to about 1 trillion
during 
> the Reagan  administration.
> >>>>>
> 
> After his tax cuts, the country went into recession.
> 
> And don't forget that Reagan instituted the largst tax increase in
American 
> History (social securty issues). 
> 
> And he compiled more debt than all the previous presidents combined.
> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> Now under Bush there has been steady growth in the economy month  by 
> month,  pulled out of the Clinton recession,and again government
revenues 
> have  grown. I don't have the exact numbers in front of me but every
now and 
> then I  hear in the news where government revenues for a quarter were 
> bigger than were  anticipated and caused the deficit to be less than  
> expected.

Historical tables can be found here
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2005/hist.html

Tax receipts declined in 2001, declined again in 2002, declined again
in 2003, stabilized in 2004 and have grown in 2005.  They would have
declined anyway in 2001 due to stock bubble bursting, but hard to say
real effect of bush tax cuts, growth has been real slow and economy
grows on its own just with growth of pop.  

Receipts under Reagan did grow from about 500 billion to about 1
trillion, but expenditures grew even more than receipts.  Of course
you'll get a growing economy under those situations.  Plus oil prices
dropped dramatically and Volcker got interest rates down.  All of this
contributed to the growth.  Economy is complicated, it grew under
reagan tax cuts, bush1 tax increase and clinton tax increase.

The debt was under 1 trillion when Reagan came in, now over 7
trillion.  It's one thing to fiscally stimulate the economy with 1
trillion in debt and another now with 7 trillion.  We have to be more
responsible in how its done now.  

I'm not against tax cuts, rates were too high when Reagan came in. 
Also, social security rates have not come down and alternative minimum
tax is hitting more people.  Have rates really come down much for avg
person?  The key for me is fair rate reduction for everyone combined
with fiscal discipline in spending.  





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to