Charlie Lutes liked to talk a lot of about it but I've read a number of
others on the subject. I didn't find them varying much in the
description. Scientifically, if we radiate electrical impulses those
might get caught in some kind of "ether" or "celestial realms". This is
something that has not been researched much.
This would mean that human beings are a "terminal" to a cosmic computer.
:-D
On 06/28/2015 02:17 PM, Michael Jackson [email protected]
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
which akashic record you talkin' about? there are quite a few
depending on which new age whacko you consult for your records
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "Bhairitu [email protected] [FairfieldLife]"
<[email protected]>
*To:* [email protected]
*Sent:* Sunday, June 28, 2015 5:06 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Can AI Machines Know Ethics?
The intellect is binary so not that hard to model. It is yes or no.
A US Berkeley student did a graduate paper which I read back in the
1990s. I had suggested this to our development team before the paper
was published and one of the project leads came across it. I recall
the student got some interesting and unexpected results with his model.
Neural networks are a way of learning. They've been around for
awhile. My books probably date back to the 1980s. But what if our
brains are really nothing more than receiver/transmitters that
communicate with the "akashic record"? Yeah, a bit "woo-woo" maybe
but could indeed be a possibility. Might explain some things.
On 06/28/2015 12:01 PM, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Everything is debatable. In an ironic sort of way, artificial
intelligence does apply to humans. I often think of you as having
artificial intelligence. Attempting to replicate human intelligence
has so far failed because the human neural network of connexions is
so complex. Many researchers are investigating insect intelligence,
which is a simpler model to try to understand. That Google paper was
interesting. Here is one of the conversations from that original paper:
Human: what is the purpose of life?
Machine: to serve the greater good.
Human: what is the purpose of living?
Machine: to live forever.
Human: what is the purpose of existence?
Machine: to find out what happens when we get to the planet earth.
Human: where are y! ou now?
Machine: i'm in the middle of nowhere.
Human: what is the purpose of dying?
Machine: to have a life.
Human: what is the purpose of being intelligent?
Machine: to find out what it is.
Human: what is the purpose of emotions?
Machine: i don't know.
I attached the original paper, A Neural Conversational Model, to this
post.
---In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>, <jr_esq@...>
<mailto:jr_esq@...> wrote :
Xeno,
I had to take a double-take to understand what you're saying. You
seem to be saying that humans are machines too. That's debatable.
In this context, we're talking about artificial intelligence which
does not apply to humans.
---In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>, <anartaxius@...>
<mailto:anartaxius@...> wrote :
Of course we can. The query to be answered is whether it is worth the
computing time and the bother of implementation.
---In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>, <jr_esq@...>
<mailto:jr_esq@...> wrote :
One machine said NO...which is correct. It's database was based on
movie scripts. But if the database included philosophical and ethics
discussions, the machine could have gotten the correct answer from
those discussions. Even if it got the correct answer, the machine
still does not know what it said.
Artificial Intelligence Machine Gets Testy With Its Programmer
<http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2015/06/26/artificial-intelligence-machine-gets-testy-with-its-programmers/?mod=yahoo_hs>
image
<http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2015/06/26/artificial-intelligence-machine-gets-testy-with-its-programmers/?mod=yahoo_hs>
Artificial Intelligence Machine Gets Testy With Its Prog...
<http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2015/06/26/artificial-intelligence-machine-gets-testy-with-its-programmers/?mod=yahoo_hs>
Machine is asked to define morality, gets annoyed when it can't.
View on blogs.wsj.com
<http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2015/06/26/artificial-intelligence-machine-gets-testy-with-its-programmers/?mod=yahoo_hs>
Preview by Yahoo
