Its sort of sad people are so vested in explaining other people's motives and experiences. I suggest you take the words of a wise man to heart.
===== All valid observations and insights that you need to temper your own experience with, not deconstruct the validity of another's experience. You can only talk about what you experience, not another. And certainly don't expect social consensus with someone like MMY. Your mind is never going to get him. Never, ever. Amen. DR PS ====== --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps I am too prone to the poetic. I thought "Its > > > a > > > HOLLOWED OUT, CRYSTALINE matrix, a unique > > > TRANSPARENT tapestry woven > > > from the RESIDUE of thousands of lives, ..." made > > > the "empty shell" > > > idea of roasted smaskaras clear. Perhaps its an > > > experiential difference. > > > > What the f**k are you talking about, Grasshopper? > > > If I may, anon or Akasha's, and Vaj's insistence on keeping > discussions of enlightenment both intellectually consistent, > available to Socratic method, and in Vaj's case, adhering to some as > yet unnamed tradition, are expressed in the emotion of 'the seeker's > burn'. It is not hostility per se in Akasha's case directed at > anyone in particular. > > He is just pissed off and frustrated in general that his > enlightenment eludes him, and chooses to take it out on anyone who > brings up the topic. I can relate, and I'm sure you can too, Peter. > Before such a breakthrough is a lot of frustration for something so > tantalizingly close and yet apparently unreachable. > > Akasha chooses to take refuge in his intellect, to explain away much > of what you and I and Tom (and Rory, when he was posting) say as > inconsistent with his head trip of 'enlightenment'. > > As for Vaj, he has studied much about enlightenment, and again is > full of 'Thou shalt' and 'Thou shalt not' stuff from various > teachers. He doesn't understand that enlightenment does not adhere > to ANY tradition. It is what it is. Period. > > Btw, did you catch Vaj's reference about offlist discussions with > Akasha on demonic possession? Well, I guess 'the devil is in the > details', as they say... > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Need Help? Get Help! Tools and Strategies for Healthy Drug-Free Living</a>. http://us.click.yahoo.com/wI.OUB/dbOLAA/d1hLAA/0NYolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
