--- In [email protected], "Ingegerd" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], off_world_beings 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "Ingegerd" 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], off_world_beings 
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "Ingegerd" 
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In [email protected], off_world_beings 
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In [email protected], Vaj 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Jan 5, 2006, at 10:46 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Nonsense. Even Jesus accepted money for his Church. 
> > Monks 
> > > and
> > > > > > > > priests have always been paid for their services 
since 
> > the 
> > > > > > beginning
> > > > > > > > of time. Ancient cultures considered these services 
> > > > paramount 
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > the most practical thing they could do, and were 
quite 
> > > happy 
> > > > > to 
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > materialistic about it, and pay for it, just like 
you 
> > > would 
> > > > > for 
> > > > > > TV,
> > > > > > > > airplanes, buses, internet computer, etc. You just 
> have 
> > > your
> > > > > > > > priorities skewed. Also, almost all ancient cultures 
> had 
> > > some
> > > > > > > > concept of Karma, and believed that they were given 
> what 
> > > > they 
> > > > > had
> > > > > > > > for a reason (wether they were given poverty or 
> wealth), 
> > > And
> > > > > > > > Maharishi has said that it is the 'deserving 
ability' 
> of 
> > > the 
> > > > > > people
> > > > > > > > that allows them to gain the necessary means, which 
is 
> > > what 
> > > > > > almost
> > > > > > > > all ancient cultures believed, including Guru Dev's 
> > > cultural
> > > > > > > > worldview.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Is there any record of Swami Brahmananda Saraswati 
> > > *charging* 
> > > > > for 
> > > > > > a  
> > > > > > > mantra? Or was it just on a donation basis? Or was it 
> free?
> > > >>>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > FREE !??? GET OVER IT  !
> > > > > > Only Maharishi and a few others have given techniques 
for 
> > > > > > free....and that NEVER lasts. NEVER. It is a fact of 
life.
> > > > > > If you wanted knoweldge from Guru Dev you had to DONATE 
> your 
> > > > time 
> > > > > as 
> > > > > > a worker, and a lot of it, OR, pay for it (yagyas etc.), 
> or 
> > > gain 
> > > > > > good karma by being a DONOR to the temple. By our 
> standards 
> > it 
> > > > > would 
> > > > > > not be much, but by Indian standards in those days it 
was 
> > not 
> > > > > > insignificant.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > OffWorld
> > > > > 
> > > > > I have teached a lot of students for free. With good 
> following-
> > > up, 
> > > > > most of them continue. 
> > > > > Ingegerd>>>
> > > > 
> > > > Good.
> > > > Can people take the TM-Sidhis if a teacher is not 
recertified?
> > > > I must admit, when I took up TM I was doing it for the 
Sidhis, 
> > > > because I knew it would be powerful and I felt I wanted 
> > something 
> > > > more than a simple relaxation technique. It would be awful 
if 
> I 
> > > > could not have taken the Sidhis.
> > > > (I for one, hate this whole recert thing)
> > > > 
> > > > OffWorld
> > > 
> > > If we suggest that TM is a very old technique coming from the 
> > Vedic 
> > > Culture, The Sidhis also comes from the same source. Why 
should 
> > the 
> > > TMO have a Mononpol to teach out the Sidhis? It does not make 
> > sense 
> > > to me. I would never teach out Maharishis Sidhi-techniques - 
> > because 
> > > they do not feel right to me. I have my own thoughts about the 
> > > Sidhis, and I think we all develop sidhi abilities during our 
> > daily 
> > > practise - regardless if it is TM or other practicies - if we 
> are 
> > > serious about what we are doing.
> > > Ingegerd>>>
> > 
> > 1.So do you tell them that they won't be able to take the TM-
> Sidhis 
> > when they learn. 
> > 2.Do you tell them that the TM-Sidhis is the only advanced 
> technique 
> > which has research published and also the only one where people 
> have 
> > been seen to effortlessly hop in lotus and that even the US 
> > gymnastics team could not come close to what these pale-faced 
> > purusha were doing when thye tried to copy it (it was on a 
video -
> US 
> > gymnastics team were completely flabbergasted).
> > 
> > OffWorld
> 
> No, I don't. It is the TMO that has to marketing those things. And 
> make their products so attractive that people would buy it 
whatever 
> it costs. I am not mentioning TM-Sidhis because I have seen none 
> effect of it among those who is still practising the techniques. 
> Many has stopped practising. Some I know who has been practising 
in 
> about 30 years, as developed High Bloodpressure, migraine, cancer 
> etc.
> Ingegerd
> >


Not me. Good luck. TM-sidhis are awesome, and those few anecdotes 
you quote don't count for much. Good luck though, I understand your 
perspective, even if in the great scheme of things, I think it will 
not be very effective. But your intentions are of the heart and 
hopefully that will carry through.

OffWorld






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to