On Feb 5, 2006, at 10:43 AM, authfriend wrote:

--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



On Feb 5, 2006, at 10:11 AM, authfriend wrote:


The "grain of the evolution of the Kosmos" sounds an

awful lot like a "standard," then.


It also sounds a lot like action in accord with the laws

of nature.


Well not really because people at different stages of development  

will experience and act that out differently.


An extreme example might be the ethnocentric or religio-centric  

stance which easily says "these people don't believe as I do,  

therefore I can set off a bomb, kill the heathens and I will go to  

heaven and screw virgins." Or the more western stance "abortion is  

evil, therefore it's OK to bomb abortion clinics and the baby 

killers within them."


People at a more global-centric Ethos which is beyond religion

will find this Ethos entirely unacceptable.


But again, this implies a standard of some kind whose

values are "better than" those of conventional morality.


Ethics and morality are not necessarily the same.



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




SPONSORED LINKS
Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to