--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Individual, internal ethics provides a "standard" only > > > > for the individual. > > > > > > And? > > > > > > Why should there be a "standard?" > > > > You were contrasting the Buddhist view of "ethics" > > with external "morality" as a standard. It refers > > to my question above as to how one can judge > > whether another is acting "ethically" if the other > > person is acting based on his/her own internal > > "ethics," which may be different from yours. > > And? > > Why should there be a 'standard?'
It refers to my question above as to how one can judge whether another is acting "ethically" if the other person is acting based on his/her own internal "ethics," which may be different from yours. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
