--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Individual, internal ethics provides a "standard" only
> > > > for the individual.  
> > > 
> > > And?
> > > 
> > > Why should there be a "standard?"
> > 
> > You were contrasting the Buddhist view of "ethics"
> > with external "morality" as a standard.  It refers
> > to my question above as to how one can judge
> > whether another is acting "ethically" if the other
> > person is acting based on his/her own internal
> > "ethics," which may be different from yours.
> 
> And?
> 
> Why should there be a 'standard?'

It refers to my question above as to how one can judge
whether another is acting "ethically" if the other
person is acting based on his/her own internal "ethics,"
which may be different from yours.







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to