--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], anony_sleuth_ff <no_reply@> > wrote: > <snip> > > The uncollected money raises suspicions that the investors -- whose > > identities and nationalities have not been made public -- had > > advance knowledge of the strikes." > > > > So now we are down to a windfall of 2.5 million for creating 9/11? > > > > I don't get it. Who bought the puts? The high jackers? Did they > > think Allah would resurrect their physical bodies after > > the "impact". They would have to be crazy or christian to beelieve > > that. > > Straw man.
In what way? > > You continue to give yourself away. How is that? > <snip> > > Overall, nothng of substance presented. I am open to, quite eager to > > validate actual, the hypothesis that statistically abnormal trading > > occured in airline stocks, gold, oil or whatever occured just prior\ > > to 9/11. Just show me the SPECIFIC DATA or better yer, the actual > > STATISTICAL analysis that indicates this was a sigma 4 or 5 event > > over a 90 or 360 day period. > > You now have more than enough information to track it > down, if you were actually interested in getting to the > bottom of it. No, you clearly have not provided enough information. What options contracts? Do you realize there are 10 or more options contracts for any given stock? (e.g.dif expiration dates, dif strike prices) But if YOU KNOW there is a statistically significant anomoly, simply show me, or cite the SPECIFIC data and analysis. Why lead me on a wild goose chase? If you have a statistically validated point, make it! Point to the specific data of your or others analysis , not a bunch of sevnvondary cites to speculations. > But you aren't. How can you possibly say I am not interested? I am competent in this type of statistical analysis. I have served as an expert witness in state regulatory proceedings on such and related issues. I am quite open to and intrigued by "insider" (aka prior knowledge of) 9/11. I am simply asking for some concrete data. The data I have analyzed, on this stranage wild goose chase of advocacy that you favor, does not show what you state. > Plus which, you are nothere w aware that many financial > institutions around the world, which have *vastly* > more expertise than you do in this area, launched > serious investigations into the anomalies. They have NO more experience or expertise than I in showing the standard devuiation of the 3-12 month series in question, and viewing the standard deviation of the suspected trades in relation to this series.. Thats all I am asking, the data, or cited analysis, where fairly standard statistical analysis showed specific trades were anomolous. Until now, all that has been citsd is speculation. If they have some advanced econometric analysis, I may be able to follow. And surely can appreciate. Please cite the studies. Otherwise its all a speculative loop of secondary sources. > You're a joke. And why is that? When not able to discuss the facts, many resort to unsupported personal attack. You appear to fit that mold. Why is my simple request of specific data, or cited statistical analysis, so threatening to you? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
