--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], anony_sleuth_ff <no_reply@> > wrote: > <snip> > > > The poster I was responding to was suggesting there > > > *were* no such anomalies (just as you were earlier), > > > which is ludicrous on its face. > > > > You are clerarly not reading my posts judy, so its hard to intervene > > with your debate with some phantom posts. I never said there were no > > anomolies, I simply asked for data and analysis so could understand > > how "anomolous" and "unsual" were being defined. The press gets > > quite excited and report sensational stuff all the time, that upon > > analysis, is much ado about nothing. > > One more time: The press didn't make up the idea that > there were anomalies. The press reported that financial > institutions all over the world thought there were > anomalies significant enough to investigate.
Yes. There was speculation based on initial viewing of the data, towarrantan investigation. And what were the results of the investigations? I have seen nothing other than the 9/11 Commission. Have you? If so, please cite. I assume nothing was reported on the conclusions of the investigations was because no conclusive statistically significant anomolies were found. The 9/11 Commission said nothing conclusive was found. So what investigation produced a conclusion that conclusive statistically significant anomolies occurred? > So drop the straw man about the press, please. I have no idea what you mean by that. You keep referring to evidence to conclusive statistically significant anomolies cited in the press. I keep asking, "Where?" > And > stop pretending How can you possibly say I am pretending. That you may have an unsubstntiated opinion of such is fine. But that hardly makes it so. I work with stock price and volume data every day. I am interested in seeing any anomolies. What more can I say. >you haven't been expressing extreme > skepticism that there were any such anomalies. Where is the extreme skepticism? Cite any quotes to support this bizzare contention. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
