--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 4/16/06 3:57:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Because it would seem to me that if Iran does indeed > > > have such "nuclear insurance," our best bet, and > > > Israel's, would be to see to it that we don't give > > > them a reason to use it. > > > > Give it up Judith, just let it go.. > > Still can't answer, huh? > > Do we need to give them a reason to use it? Isn't the existence of > Israel reason enough?
It seems obvious to me that the reason Iran feels the need for "insurance" is to deter Israel and the U.S. from attacking *them*. Or, absolute worst case, to do a preemptive strike. That's what all the "annihilation" talk is about, to discourage us from messing with Iran. But if Iran no longer had reason to believe we would attack them, they would no longer need a deterrent. > So we hold off provoking them until they have two pieces of > insurance or three pieces or four or..... Why would they go to such trouble if they felt secure? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
