--- In [email protected], "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> 
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> > > > > On Apr 17, 2006, at 12:01 PM, sparaig wrote:
> > > > <snip>
> > > > > > There's no mention of correlation between EEG changes and
> > > > > > enlightenment in any of the research that Vaj mentions, 
> > whereas
> > > > > > that's one of the big areas of study for EEG and brain 
> > imaging 
> > > at
> > > > > > MUM currently.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The way I would show the same EEG pattern if I wanted to 
> > > > > duplicate "witnessing" on the EEG is to do ishta meditation 
> > > > > with a mantra (what Tibetans call yidam practice). It 
> > > > > duplicates the same EEG signature as TMers doing ishta 
mantra. 
> > > > > Very easy to do.
> > > > 
> > > > But you'd be meditating, right?
> > > > 
> > > > I think Lawson's talking about in activity.
> > > 
> > > Both. The description of meditation in the samatha pdf file 
starts 
> > > off sounding like TM and then morphs into something else, or so 
it 
> > > seems. Any technique that inspires that kind of first-hand 
> > > description definitely isn't TM, though without direct 
comparisons 
> > > of EEG and other physiological parameters, we can't be sure if 
the 
> > > distinctions have any pragmatic effect on what is actually 
going on 
> > > in the brain.
> > 
> > Right.  My point was that Vaj is claiming he can emulate
> > the TM EEG signature *during meditation*, but even if he
> > can, that wouldn't necessarily mean he could also
> > emulate it *during activity*.
> > 
> > While "witnessing" certainly can occur during TM, the
> > bread-and-butter aspect is when it occurs in activity. 
> > 
> > > Also, Ken Wilber's cute little EEG demo shows nothing in and of 
> > > itself. Vaj appears to be basing his claims on Wilber's demo or 
> > > something that he has done himself with similar apparatus.
> > 
> > Well, it shows he has some control over whatever it is
> > the machine is measuring, which is moderately impressive
> > in and of itself.  But it doesn't get us anywhere unless
> > we have a better idea of what it's measuring.
> 
> Judy, 
>   Wilber talks extensively about his experience of witnessing. From
> his writings it's pretty clear he has the experience.

I don't believe I suggested that Wilber didn't have
the experience of witnessing, so I'm not sure of the
relevance of this to what I said.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to