--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > <snip> > > > From my point of view, Lawson represents an almost- > > > perfect example of the "TM paradigm," which is based on > > > the assumption that the TM view of things and descrip- > > > tion of things is correct, and that any view or description > > > that differs from that is by definition incorrect. > > > > > > > Well of course. However, I'm well aware that my paradigm may be > > flawed, incorrect and/or incomplete. > > And one of the ways you *find out* whether your > paradigm is flawed, incorrect, and/or incomplete > is to compare it closely with other paradigms, > including the rationales for those paradigms, and > scientific research if it's available. > > Barry's basing his accusation that you aren't open > to other paradigms on the fact that you're doing > exactly what would be expected if you *were* open > to other paradigms. >
But the scientific paradigm is one that Barry rejects (when it suits him, I think) when dealing with spiritual matters. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
