>
The shift from a bound self to a
> non-localized Self is pure acausal grace that can not
> be enacted from the side of the bound mind.
And if the shift occurs, and there is something acausal, then what
does the acausal thing have to do with the shift?
This appear so be a non-statment. Or one of no consequence. "A" has
nothing to do with "B". "B" shifts. (So why bring up "A"?)
If the grace is causal, then on one level, there is some meaning in
the statement.
But grace implies something outside of IT. Thus its support on
someting. Which contradicts prior statements.
It sounds like these statements of this genre are personal
interpretations of an "experience". They may be correct, clear,
insightful interpretations, they may be fuzzy, inconsistent and
distoreted. But they make sense to the interpreter.
Like I intepret the sun rising every morning. It works for me. It IS
what I see. It resonates with me. But I know its an "incorrect"
interpretation of whats really going on.
But these types of interpretations are more akin to poetry that is
trying to describe love or beauty, not an internally-consistent and
logical truth.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
| Maharishi university of management | Maharishi mahesh yogi | Ramana maharshi |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
