--- In [email protected], "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- johnlasher20002000 wrote:
> >
> > As I'm sure any of the psychologists on the list who have worked 
with
> > EEG biofeedback can attest, and I also have personal experience 
with,
> > a scalp electrode to provide brainwave feedback only measures a 
tiny
> > electrical impulse. Any movement or even blinking the eyes will
> > interfere with the accuracy of the reading. How can the TMO 
results
> > showing maximum brainwave coherence (which is a  Fourier Analysis 
of
> > the outputs) while flying be possible. The movement would destroy 
the
> > data output???
> 
> I recall this being discussed in the 1970s, but 
> don't remember how it was addressed. The 
> posters were titled something like 
> "maximum coherence at liftoff," language 
> which suggests they took the reading in 
> that initial nanosecond when the brain 
> was coherent but the body had yet to 
> lurch.

That's my understanding as well.


> How's that for a mushy, uninformative response?
> 
> Would you ask David Orme-Johnson? The email
> address at his Truth About TM site is
> davidoj at gnt dot net.
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/o9xgo
>







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to