--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@> wrote:
And the Scientific American article I mentioned a week or two ago
specifically says that
brain wave coherence is something that seperates the brains of
higher-order critters like
primates and mammals from lower order ones.
haha. And yet the top article on google scholar search for BWC was
about BWC in monkeys.
Did you bother with the pubmed search?
Yes I did. I havn't reviewed all 1000+ yet. Give me some time and I
may have some comments.
Am I correct in inferring that in your above remark you are indicating
that you did not like my monkey coherence observation? It was an
independent, an non-linked, observation. Funny I thought. But perhaps
it requires a threshold level of coherence to laugh (at it).
The higher on the evolutionary scale, at
least in the human perspective (where we're the highest), the
more often EEG coherence
shows up. The explanation is that it apparently shows that
larger brain structures are
involved in problem solving.
Since you were not forthcoming regarding my request for cites for the
studies behind your summary of the SA article, I bought the SA issue,
$5. And there were no cites of any published research the article or
behind your statement above.
As I suspected might be the case, some is conjecture and speculation
of the SA article author or his speculation of what one of the
scientists might have speculated.
Whew. Speculations can be fun, but thats not the same as peer reviewed
published research backing up the specualtion and personal
observations.(Though some readers bizarely imply, apparently, or
beleives, that all statements in SA are backed up by cited published
research).
And you remember or at least relayed to us more than what is actually
in the article, IMO.
